From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw1-x112d.google.com (mail-yw1-x112d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::112d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63AD23B29D for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2023 13:35:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-yw1-x112d.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-586a684e85aso18391777b3.2 for ; Sat, 05 Aug 2023 10:35:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pion-ly.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1691256951; x=1691861751; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bPptfKB3ZvjIa6vQu5GQR1ChvHeeLqx8tRRiSQzOas8=; b=Jq3klaTk0X+bXgucYuJnXr+fiieTeSTwktlCqHeI/AvuI0lHArGEaTPKY12k/r4Krk eNPBH6JDTSCj/5p4dOxc7KPwO2ZXFHfmSs74t1DcTVdh1xFFF1JkJCMUwsEvhObCF9Kh aWGwP3MYQuQ+ccrJZCfp+1IbE1ZW1LqsChtLVHYyzwz0AN+Q1Iz2S0FBli240cEtbAyz L6WnGG9tklEJeHq3A2/qapYttxpL8D3xUJoHzoHTgNsFWVT5D9Wc/v2rOw0a6N99pz+w mWlZ96JLEJ+5hNL1o3MWLHVl+aQ/h698B21fKf/k5LitQtFfePHyIFbApsH3UtSWadaw QXzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691256951; x=1691861751; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bPptfKB3ZvjIa6vQu5GQR1ChvHeeLqx8tRRiSQzOas8=; b=PllIRQbNol2T/6XELGyPPrjnKDIhtFpa6w1qgujOUAUqPBbwUTvRy2dkW6Lujio5vx LdLDihrJlJPqP1cQvE+VsiJCLaCvFAAolDfK2dg9cOi9BFVfEy6izlDPbW68RIWUIXDJ CKZBqWPbXVwxEoSRCPHFPh67PtCFJJJOKJ+rAW+5cXR6YEe6YQenC8uQHw1Mtyj9KU++ aQzoe1IJ2aQ0O1gKbt1Vzng19QTX7MJiPZapSeInSdE49vzSe8PijbzAdVN8DnjjhvEE /DlxJMxbSC7AJqDz8rYRa6NDl5crP7aAzn/btnUfh659Rzh77wfX+378O9dGA/Lrdbzw tYpw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwwaViuYv4UUhgxnzz5fUuP4huGUjM3IIMVkCua6qn7aIj3bPwH iuUamVEn26Apzhz4TWbpvUMO128tg+mk6Wrn6o9RJLlsRxJwWtC5jy30kw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGe3YhP/Hs+WayN78551FGLvrK4DXvx1PpHqVpcsCH9zjxJyS66b7gaI/PcD7tNz4MaAcXTGi/Tmm2UwjmLzsY= X-Received: by 2002:a0d:eb56:0:b0:583:a418:c3fc with SMTP id u83-20020a0deb56000000b00583a418c3fcmr5003342ywe.23.1691256951440; Sat, 05 Aug 2023 10:35:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Sean DuBois Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2023 13:35:40 -0400 Message-ID: To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d09d5506023071e0" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 05 Aug 2023 13:37:23 -0400 Subject: [Bloat] Easiest/most effective way to test software against adverse networks? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2023 17:35:52 -0000 --000000000000d09d5506023071e0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I am working on improving Pion's Google Congestion Control algorithm https://github.com/pion/interceptor/tree/master/pkg/gcc. As I start to use it in more real world networks I find flaws. How are people testing software today? Is 'Traffic Control' the best option? --000000000000d09d5506023071e0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I am working on improving Pion's Google Congestion Con= trol algorithm=C2=A0https://github.com/pion/interceptor/tree/master/pkg/gcc. A= s I start to use it in more real world networks I find flaws.

How are people testing software today? Is 'Traffic Control' t= he best option?
--000000000000d09d5506023071e0--