From: Matt Mathis <matt.mathis@gmail.com>
To: Sam Crawford <sam@samknows.com>
Cc: "Dave Täht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
"Dave Taht via Bloat" <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
Rpm <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"Sebastian Moeller" <moeller0@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Rpm] An 8 years perspective on broadband in the usa - fcc data
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2022 19:39:34 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+s1KQGG7ZB4kposGajsHcUxh38CTdNvChkG1Sx7w8XDfBJ+Og@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81153147-A7F5-4AC7-A07A-320FBE66C94B@gmx.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2747 bytes --]
Sam, see the question below about your methodology, from your FCC report.
Thanks,
--MM--
Evil is defined by mortals who think they know "The Truth" and use force to
apply it to others.
-------------------------------------------
Matt Mathis (Email is best)
Home & mobile: 412-654-7529 please leave a message if you must call.
On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 8:46 AM Sebastian Moeller via Rpm <
rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> > On Jun 19, 2022, at 17:32, Dave Taht via Bloat <
> bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> >
> > It's not clear if they are only measuring downloads in fig 4. ?
> >
> >
> https://vaibhavbajpai.com/documents/papers/proceedings/fcc-networking-2022.pdf
>
> indeed:
>
> "The SamKnows probes measure a variety of broadband met- rics [22] over
> IPv4. The tests [22] covered in this paper include: multi-threaded download
> speed, UDP latency, UDP latency un- der load, and UDP packet loss. The
> tests connect to the closest measurement servers (based on round-trip
> time); measurement servers are hosted both off-net (outside of ISP
> boundary) and on-net (within ISP boundary). The off-net measurement points
> were hosted by Measurement Lab (M-Lab) [23] and changed to Level 3
> Communications (CenturyLink) across ten cities in the US, while the on-net
> measurement targets are hosted by the ISPs themselves. The FCC publishes
> the raw data for each month [24], along with annual reports on major
> findings [25]. For controllability reasons, the annual MBA reports only
> cover measurements to the off-net locations, i.e., latency results might be
> inflated due to geographical distance. Thus, we also consider the on-net
> measurements in our analysis."
>
> reference 22 points to
> https://www.fcc.gov/general/measuring-broadband-america-open-methodology
> "Latency under load Average round trip time for a series of regularly
> spaced UDP packets sent during downstream/upstream sustained tests"
>
> this seems to imply that it would be mixed upload/download saturation?
>
>
> But I agree that this is unclear... maybe Sam (Crawford) knows (pun
> intended), I do not have his email, but maybe he is on-list or someone else
> can relay that question?
>
> Regards
> Sebastian
>
>
> >
> >
> > --
> > FQ World Domination pending:
> https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/
> > Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bloat mailing list
> > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rpm mailing list
> Rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/rpm
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4241 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-19 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-19 15:32 [Bloat] " Dave Taht
2022-06-19 15:46 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-06-19 19:39 ` Matt Mathis [this message]
2022-06-19 19:51 ` [Bloat] [Rpm] " Sam Crawford
2022-06-19 21:18 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-06-20 12:37 Justus
2022-06-20 14:19 ` Dave Taht
2022-06-20 14:38 ` Fries, Justus
2022-06-20 21:49 ` Dave Collier-Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+s1KQGG7ZB4kposGajsHcUxh38CTdNvChkG1Sx7w8XDfBJ+Og@mail.gmail.com \
--to=matt.mathis@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=sam@samknows.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox