Re: [Bloat] Beyond Bufferbloat: End-to-End Congestion Control Cannot Avoid Latency Spikes

[Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>]

I am very pre-coffee. Something that could build on this would involve
FQ. More I cannot say, til more coffee.

On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 3:56 AM Bjørn Ivar Teigen <bjorn@domos.no> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've recently published a paper on Arxiv which is relevant to the Bufferbloat problem. I hope it will be helpful in convincing AQM doubters.
> Discussions at the recent IAB workshop inspired me to write a detailed argument for why end-to-end methods cannot avoid latency spikes. I couldn't find this argument in the literature.
>
> Here is the Arxiv link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.00488
>
> A direct consequence is that we need AQMs at all points in the internet where congestion is likely to happen, even for short periods, to mitigate the impact of latency spikes. Here I am assuming we ultimately want an Internet without lag-spikes, not just low latency on average.
>
> Hope you find this interesting!
>
> --
> Bjørn Ivar Teigen
> Head of Research
> +47 47335952 | bjorn@domos.no | www.domos.no
> WiFi Slicing by Domos
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat



-- 
I tried to build a better future, a few times:
https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org

Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC