From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x22e.google.com (mail-ob0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7532C3CBE0 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 22:21:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ob0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id bg3so22164583obb.1 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 19:21:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JNxu37zpxs1/vuZCvc2/gxB6984782iqIJUjpSOf6mI=; b=hk1DsP5Z9h3ZH7zSoCmHm9tX8eY5LjmGq8UCwb2DFTdA/8j9tY3q1XN225LrzA3YW5 G1t7YsvfX4HbKFoFgRtun5Mid3XCIUgmNPJmtNxAyfY1bOCrl8HR625+d3r6LtQcLzH1 CCaSHESR4QD7HwGwjGxe48wX3RhVT25fTvfci8lRhqRSD6hpmZKWk4t7cOCCz9arUz+D 7r7jhA6mRhgcnCXUWZDsVSvWx9F0vAyDREb5wuENPIZO2IslJ79x46D3mtEEkTemrNye 6RLDVqAHrCCZl6WkUzxf6HL6xCH6uwXIVWnJo5+RpEHdCd1MNxutqancsPlPTRpWdyzR RKUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JNxu37zpxs1/vuZCvc2/gxB6984782iqIJUjpSOf6mI=; b=gtEBL6hw/9NUCnifqIb88Xax4LEJrnUonMaxkeBq9LRjhPc0oIEPsqWhTQec/iASNX NF92gYtQ3TKhnBUXHizKYLjZ7QbuO//fITDv0f3dpEmIAKyhQr6XPMMCwIiJ9IImLJTz l1OQBfHd3RkmHOxy0+1VTAiA3syXlx5/LYQ/mOSPRspQ60btqMedXIJzqmKGVrd5Tmkd RPz8qNRQS0kT2Sc84li4NJ4eZvElTnUctDHz70D/w4AepTJPmRElJDckpOA8Wsjh1g5Y ccUkalmJu/ZfYOXiLLdKQitIHcW40ygfKBzQmHaJXu9LKR7ufnuP+HQ0aPmShb5NLnsz 1yLw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJI4wYxFuuOj2ZUWYEGa7XLjykD4/yLBF0Cse746rpKExiho1SM3pGfHeQD1etbFcs1/zmxYIne7lDtG8w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.38.233 with SMTP id j9mr5418224obk.57.1459909314912; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 19:21:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.79.215 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 19:21:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 19:21:54 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Brandon Applegate Cc: bloat Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Bloat] dslreports bufferbloat tests X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 02:21:55 -0000 On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Brandon Applegate wrote: > >> On Apr 5, 2016, at 9:04 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> Does anyone know what the "quality" portion of dslreport's metric means? > > Basically - packet loss. > > https://www.dslreports.com/faq/17930 Sigh. I ranted. I might rant harder. http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/bufferbloat_vs_quality/ > > =E2=80=94 > Quality Grades > > Quality refers to average detected packet loss / re-transmit percentages = during download phase. The higher the packet loss / re-transmit percentage = the more inefficient the connection is, and a very poor result may be indic= ative of congestion, inside wiring issues or other problems that need addre= ssing. > > 1% or less - A+ > 2.5% or less - A > 3% or less - B > 5% or less - C > 12% or less - D > over 12% - F > =E2=80=94 > > > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat >