From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x22f.google.com (mail-ob0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E51282005CA for ; Sat, 30 May 2015 13:00:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obcnx10 with SMTP id nx10so73998655obc.2 for ; Sat, 30 May 2015 13:00:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yuCotK6BWItBdSZ9N8vZ+07rh4UjCIkecHnC+4aYCfM=; b=V1SWDg2OvOMk1+LINudL2QTti66/m+hbDbBu/ax8YnNTvQQvBUT7ZHBx0aBkATUi0X bPVXANLJwBogDXIpVvn4S63sC2StutGWuBLwXPlKtAov4GIPBvGgEABQSxKEGJQqiHRh MRICdxAUxGQZs+6o2xaNHyp42ZAarT7NqZHeNyX0Q2KPAqgIer/1MQsSNm5GrI+my7k1 ZlgXxz5aZT21fUopM96ms6xLTUvDFkF4mbZ1hOWHck5NEUn/Xyjx2Ntx4Qxfi5NEa+ev FlA6FdeS+ynYRp4vSC9BBl+pIeSdKVgqM0vvtrT71fDO3f2wIUjo/BCZg2J1/zLNwpAp hXPg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.88.131 with SMTP id bg3mr12277572obb.29.1433016018719; Sat, 30 May 2015 13:00:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.105.146 with HTTP; Sat, 30 May 2015 13:00:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 13:00:18 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: bloat Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Bloat] I thought the diagram, at least, was a good start X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 20:02:18 -0000 http://serverfault.com/questions/695541/reducing-bufferbloat-in-linux-web-s= erver --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast