From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com (mail-wg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8B4E21F208 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:35:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n12so2011868wgh.35 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:35:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zg0Zxid+fuczNP1WIRsjxGEqWOK23PDDUxRtW2cWuHY=; b=Bxn5SS2D7Hk/bn0sEZvqVQc/hZ6Nkg6W0N9n0UZzpF5iFcl0p45h000Wd02tZvDoBj dOZtPgz9FJ5nIhWqpHQPCn9TT5Dn13k5GLG6uST7h3i76fDbI6+ITUa1AEkUtUpvV78A A8Bq3BDzwCVwr2ODatg4Ce8gwvYwa2/0geP0ojcNfXqsiaNVgah3QQZRAMVwk5Fgfd7W Ie/Z00CGwDjC5zj2FedScA6YHt70lPZi88/0qHcg6jJvDJWjdPp94pqKXhPGp3fwgi52 c1/dSMai6WblJ82C1hmj/SoflqUpZAM+CHEyoLWpIoeTQ/xW/EiYTPWDm7vXvGEd5Ua2 TxAw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.143.18 with SMTP id sa18mr182920wjb.70.1383176129582; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:35:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.67.202 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:35:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20131030162534.29f34ada@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:35:29 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Mikael Abrahamsson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] T-Mobile LTE buffer bloat X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 23:35:32 -0000 On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrot= e: > On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > >> Not surprisingly it has huge bloat and a stupid http proxy that netalyze= r >> claims rewrites images. > > > This could be done in the provider network, did you try it without the > thingie? > > >> How can the uplink side be so bad! 5 seconds??? > > > My personal record for a mobile network is 180 seconds RTT. They *really* > *really* want to deliver the packets, and if the radio environment go bad > they'll still buffer 400 packets (or so). Darn. You win. The worst I've seen is 84 seconds. > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se > > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html