From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] extremely good dslreports result for bufferbloat on free.fr
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:32:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4GybnhjxBrDZLb-KbbjBr_emuHH-qDD7z4ouP0gqBt9Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87618e6gkm.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek
<jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:
> Free.fr (Proxad) is certainly much better than other ISPs -- they've been
> the first to give sort-of-native (6rd) IPv6 to the masses. However,
> there's one thing that annoys me -- they have two distinct CPEs, the
> classic FreeBox (which I have) and the FreeBox Revolution (which is
> slightly less cheap, and takes more physical space -- a big deal if you
> live in Paris). The classic FreeBox needs some love from the firmware
> developers, and I'd be curious to know whether your results apply equally
> to both boxen.
All ya gotta do is run the new dslreports and/or rrul test(s) on your
own older box, and post. ;)
My understanding was that the old freebox was too weak to run anything
but SFQ, but it did run that on the outbound.
>
> (The thing that most pisses me off with the classic FreeBox is that it
> doesn't allow IPv6 subnetting -- unless you order the FreeBox Revolution,
> you're condemned to the purgatory of ND-proxying. Grr.)
As tiny as the mods now are to support more extensive ipv6 in openwrt,
that certainly was not the case in 2012.
>
> -- Juliusz
--
Dave Täht
Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware**
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-29 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-28 14:48 Dave Taht
2015-04-28 23:33 ` jb
2015-04-28 23:44 ` David Lang
2015-04-29 1:39 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-04-29 2:01 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-29 2:49 ` jb
2015-04-29 16:32 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2015-04-29 18:32 ` Dave Taht [this message]
[not found] ` <CAH3Ss96FnwgK8qxdV-n46GLe2FSsRRa7zD1M_Wmq91o=+-7qdQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-04-30 4:23 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-30 4:33 ` jb
2015-04-30 4:43 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-30 4:55 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-30 5:23 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-30 5:49 ` jb
2015-04-30 16:36 ` Dave Taht
2015-05-01 0:48 ` Rich Brown
2015-05-01 3:10 ` jb
2015-05-01 4:41 ` [Bloat] ThinkBroadBand also has a bloat detector in their speed test Rich Brown
2015-05-01 6:17 ` jb
2015-05-01 6:05 ` [Bloat] extremely good dslreports result for bufferbloat on free.fr Dave Taht
2015-05-01 6:31 ` jb
2015-05-01 8:10 ` Dave Taht
2015-05-02 11:49 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-05-02 13:40 ` jb
2015-05-02 15:01 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-05-02 16:55 ` Dave Taht
2015-05-02 17:15 ` Aaron Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw4GybnhjxBrDZLb-KbbjBr_emuHH-qDD7z4ouP0gqBt9Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox