From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3578A21F182 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:32:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by oblw8 with SMTP id w8so26922802obl.0 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:32:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jcLvmQPrDzWKuW/ivxmGVxdU3c1vPaW+P4uM4ILfK70=; b=rgJ+LbxLPyoTqyEvJ2iy9BATTjsS85H8syVC2bwg/rEojleCcs9eyU+8rmGokrBtyZ /Y7CRfcR0v9lJfdqrPK8nGmEa9blqV+VkskbgTE+ixoJteo5YVmP7Ozul7+45gHnQQj/ 8l1YrCUAAWS+6q+gS57LGtcZAt7rbNE/Qaj+plgLSwzhWqvc0pXCpDfwUzr6NuODygHS Upf65QCbDLe0oB7HPz6zDPY1XRj/Fssj8EcFjtNuKecDX/D8fejVxtTQvfuWqksG9dzt 9Wydac+UhIyHjjDhq6Z9vD7l/YGbUu5wK6eK7/Zf16ngxgyhwd5UIvySQ6TVrUW1KzPa KpUQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.227.130 with SMTP id a124mr303151oih.59.1430332340055; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:32:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.71.139 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:32:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87618e6gkm.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> References: <87618e6gkm.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:32:19 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Juliusz Chroboczek Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] extremely good dslreports result for bufferbloat on free.fr X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 18:33:01 -0000 On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > Free.fr (Proxad) is certainly much better than other ISPs -- they've been > the first to give sort-of-native (6rd) IPv6 to the masses. However, > there's one thing that annoys me -- they have two distinct CPEs, the > classic FreeBox (which I have) and the FreeBox Revolution (which is > slightly less cheap, and takes more physical space -- a big deal if you > live in Paris). The classic FreeBox needs some love from the firmware > developers, and I'd be curious to know whether your results apply equally > to both boxen. All ya gotta do is run the new dslreports and/or rrul test(s) on your own older box, and post. ;) My understanding was that the old freebox was too weak to run anything but SFQ, but it did run that on the outbound. > > (The thing that most pisses me off with the classic FreeBox is that it > doesn't allow IPv6 subnetting -- unless you order the FreeBox Revolution, > you're condemned to the purgatory of ND-proxying. Grr.) As tiny as the mods now are to support more extensive ipv6 in openwrt, that certainly was not the case in 2012. > > -- Juliusz --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67