From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-il1-x12c.google.com (mail-il1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61F123B29E for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:32:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-il1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id b12so8092370ilf.11 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 12:32:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Bon17fdF9tsO5d3OU19PpRPx6HMnSGYfM1EqdJeXUXs=; b=V6/NXiSmD+c0dZRLglEBArnLpCV/IyHecoSidxAs5mTYNqU7ZjMkTs4PotnvGznNEt mUTbVhBemOOy254ZzKOSFW0pRYKiL6WOAF0cZpcLIgC847E0ZzOMQegltsG+D8Oc30RY LkW0tISH7n01dTS8ePPe+rU8JEBAVjWwknTq+b8MEkkvjXCN2txI8Bilwl9PepoU53aK S3j41T+H+FychVmXFJn82EBlj+7F4DVMfb5TtJiBWWLfiktrYmJ0ATvgskAHd/+KpNDq gq33o2O4lIVUMCxBcMVwUvLdpa5b7e5tA4jv12zVWaL/FKRzk5KrGOHw9CcfkcF9R5cZ GD2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Bon17fdF9tsO5d3OU19PpRPx6HMnSGYfM1EqdJeXUXs=; b=zp3OV20lBC9+6ratnDJhOSHv7CR0Q732cLN52i/hz6WpyZPU9OadnPKDFnFdWgeRpt VBYBBxlF/Iy6BRgVoiaHJiF2Zxwj18Z5AQDGNGq3U3TSNl9hYHfUDGLRfVBnH0kpe4ZW SttRivKed8hpf0JRBQilwXPwtR3qbgBKqfhpQTrZhlPriwYcsMvrcaXclip80aas9cMN BgHVvCYcbPnRvYUu2ZyJtoYvSjJ74WFuGv/cvbfkvfBnp3l6oThS0rE9ClsXsX/coOaW PpuTeM/FfkF+rvgv4cyysZmA3V3uTJq7hkM1do6A/Iz++/ybrbovMSpHOpHrJFc5outd MtnA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531pzMzKfzamXJbvazKdJ4Vvs34HZ6S+qY0T6yUPHwYPOmQxrNch EUBKQS3nvLEq++LJOoiHlGWfuXKGY6gW1uRN7rf8Z484 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy0Xjvu7DaiTPnCgtr3d/VZ3sqGhITF5PUuBlZEoJXjIq9BfxJTgyoV3nYHLm//72tOz7lcj2E/yMjWMhuXGmw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:8a3:: with SMTP id a3mr5437428ilt.88.1633030334417; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 12:32:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2572762.KRHqeOQrTU@7b74a564-70da-4baa-82f8-b74434554dd0> In-Reply-To: <2572762.KRHqeOQrTU@7b74a564-70da-4baa-82f8-b74434554dd0> From: Dave Taht Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 12:32:01 -0700 Message-ID: To: bloat , basti.endres@fau.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Bloat] Fwd: Interop runner with satellite links X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 19:32:15 -0000 of interest to the bufferbloat lost. Nice work sebastian! ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Sebastian Endres Date: Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 12:58 PM Subject: Interop runner with satellite links To: , Cc: Dear all, for my master's thesis we ran measurements of all publicly available QUIC implementations over an emulated satellite link. The results are available online: https://interop.sedrubal.de/ A click on the results also shows time-offset plots, but are not available for every combination. In general, the performance of QUIC over high latency (e.g., geostationary satellites) is rather poor, especially if there is packet loss. Would it make sense to add such tests with challenging link characteristics to the official QUIC interop runner? Best regards, Sebastian --=20 Fixing Starlink's Latencies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dc9gLo6Xrwgw Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC