Re: [Bloat] The Dark Problem with AQM in the Internet?

[Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Kenyon Ralph <kenyon@kenyonralph.com> wrote:
> On 2014-08-28T20:00:54+0200, Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 08/28/2014 06:35 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
>> > When a message is lost due to an error, how do you determine whose fault
>> > it is?
>>
>> Links need to be engineered for the optimum combination of power,
>> bandwidth, overhead and residual error that meets requirements. I agree
>> with your implied point that a single error is unlikely to be indicative
>> of a real problem, but a link not meeting requirements is someone's fault.
>>
>> So like Jerry I'd be interested in an ability for endpoints to be able
>> to collect statistics on per-hop loss probabilities so that admins can
>> hold their providers accountable.
>
> Here is some relevant work:
> http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2417573
> "Measurement and Analysis of Internet Interconnection and Congestion"

Wow. That gets the "paper of the month" award from me.

> --
> Kenyon Ralph
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>



-- 
Dave Täht

NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article