From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com (mail-we0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 502BB21F0BA for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:15:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id q59so1013391wes.41 for ; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 10:15:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ECeXKL583kiqt2pafW5maV65gn9NAVEcOfG2hOvB6Kc=; b=Slu1Y+VfVT9TIDMa6zFPwaBhihhtkUpeFXQxtqUG7uevD4Y/tyRCI0VMnXw6eECIge XpK5sI4h0bNqExN3O30noHpSLIk/PgaiqPGzRDrZnNFN+c3l78B4laJvGUKjvkFfXH0t Yrnbjjzn8pm2487MdhSBby2JeVcc9FIsnC2FRc5DqMmzC9q2P2ZXQqQ63iOYX+q/Kwgc /tW2KotNpgoNVpNlLXMtG77JfQ1LNnxGU8p4okhnbiYd160usxLluVpXzUq7WUH7YdPs ZlinoRcl9rw9IYKMeZ7IJfSjgpybjxRF/TKK0O+8UPTFLvGrN1oZMYIVBlSJGlpqa1fU vtkg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.101.197 with SMTP id fi5mr3703288wib.46.1386353747843; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 10:15:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.51.5 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:15:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7ieh5pew2d.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> References: <20131203222559.GV8066@einstein.kenyonralph.com> <7ieh5pew2d.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:15:47 -0800 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Juliusz Chroboczek Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] curious..... X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 18:15:51 -0000 On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >> I note that openwrt's qos-scripts still do not do ipv6 properly, and I t= hink >> cerowrt's aqm system is better in most respects, and it's easy to >> include on an openwrt system. > > Perhaps you should push your system to OpenWRT? There is still some work going on to streamline the gui. there are less features in the aqm-scripts for prioritizing packet types than qos-scripts. I just had to come up with a way to disable it at high (> 80 mbit) rates on incoming traffic (not enough cpu in cerowrt), so I'd like it to run faster, maybe using drr in that case, or something like what free.fr uses... And there are actually two aqm/packet scheduling shapers in there (a simple 1 tier and a 3 tier one), and it supports a variety of aqm/scheduling algorithms, not just fq_codel, which is there for the research but will confuse the end users... and I am not happy with "aqm" at a word, because the packet scheduling part counts for a LOT, so i'd rename it to sqm or someting like that. So I'd argue it needs some love. And a solid set of requirements that it meets before it is as standardized as, say, wondershaper is. And if it got that standardized, I think it would run a heck of a lot faster if it got poured into C. However it is pretty stable and could definitely use more eyeballs, and it works right with ipv6 and seems better than qos-scripts on most benchmarks... so I'll ask the openwrt folk if they want it upstream. In the interim, existing openwrt users can add ceropackages-3.3 into their feeds. And incorporate it into their build with ./scripts feeds install aqm-scripts luci-app-aqm > -- Juliusz --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html