* Re: [Bloat] april 7th fcc on broadband labels
2022-03-30 15:21 [Bloat] april 7th fcc on broadband labels Dave Taht
@ 2022-03-31 16:03 ` Dave Collier-Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Collier-Brown @ 2022-03-31 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bloat
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2224 bytes --]
A little politicking: change the name to make the metric actually mean what it says.
Turn "Typical packet loss" into "Typical retransmissions".
"Packet loss" is misleading except to a TCP/IP expert.
We recommend reporting reporting what losses cause, retransmissions. Retransmissions are meaningful to the consumer, because it tells them what percentage of the packets are significantly delayed. Like high latency, retransmissions cause delays, garbling, drop-outs and "buffering" messages in both audio and video.
If we have someone there for the Q&A or if someone knows one of the panelists, super. In any case, get it to them in writing as a bug report, not a request for improvement.
--dave
And the fix is only a few extra characters, and fits in the space on the label
On 3/30/22 11:21, Dave Taht wrote:
Anyone got a presence at this? I'd really like to kill "typical"
packet loss as a metric dead...
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-announces-second-public-hearing-broadband-consumer-labels
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
dave.collier-brown@indexexchange.com<mailto:dave.collier-brown@indexexchange.com> | -- Mark Twain
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER : This telecommunication, including any and all attachments, contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited and is not a waiver of confidentiality. If you have received this telecommunication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic mail and delete the message from your inbox and deleted items folders. This telecommunication does not constitute an express or implied agreement to conduct transactions by electronic means, nor does it constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment or an acceptance of a contract offer. Contract terms contained in this telecommunication are subject to legal review and the completion of formal documentation and are not binding until same is confirmed in writing and has been signed by an authorized signatory.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3069 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread