From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-il1-x12c.google.com (mail-il1-x12c.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12c])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00DF43B2A4
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 19:34:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-il1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id e8so15407968ilu.9
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 16:34:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=R3wvLmBhJPBWPf4dTR1WKO5LExvmmn/WPw9oFzM05Sg=;
 b=nINqRaNUBjje8ueyv9a5cVnwaZ2YnrK48/QM8PC9AaBIIEFHsN/+/XwkPQ0HpOplR2
 oY91moVx09oI0R7+UWkiOoOaYpUqs3wuneanYprTeFPShnFGDSueMAlZRccvWj3ONEMo
 xmYcSZb8hLw3Qc/yBMg93j/ESRIYWrZmq71OB0Xnn+vOUfndJ3B9/llF+vbPRE6DQZKN
 dbTc38xqjvxmeYjuT8sNzul5XzZkFTt3U4B0/YYh98PDXDz5dpTAHfA0R1vT1vYyQD42
 OG9sKSaKKayvlll52rHV0SJ+gzIm48jgdrQhoXOYeJNpYs2lKh4qjAotRCY9Cp2aShnW
 fgDg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=R3wvLmBhJPBWPf4dTR1WKO5LExvmmn/WPw9oFzM05Sg=;
 b=6F0N1+FmYRLt9JC0EcCi0S371E+/+Jw+xfpRqoYqcjYKtskusObEN82oVN6JuvMGF+
 CBBrzY0OUbDGSK/TszBk5vOkjYC52Id4W+ZRYHtTNyaw3PbzSDOZYXfUbAMsVewoC2m+
 FM4dwCnefpmmIzixrwntIyvbcdfz6D2geXi/BAG3sU8N6IDJN+ZnZZt5grswan/sUgsh
 bAsUSqs4SxtLwpVxpBA2N4PPl0wQ78Xh59O+r+cwvrmw4m/ob9JDmgI5BqcFv9iwqYjQ
 qbybG3qyTX9Wu/BSd2pE2WrfsFBsKw4jke3FXAD7GU55m/47ShgjpgO5AIwwk+21EwTP
 qTBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531KDxs2dsMeqqyjDyS2PDCEkX1DLZ3xB8Okbc9dtO8mhY4Tj0Gf
 9mA/Yq/QKg+h3zffGGp+0bEdsB0knQAv866/x3hh8sTycuw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2i1aWWbqgKdY0YzYP42Y6tysWDN3i4kNC5ZcD4b+0fzJoinSNlpZ3k0gXc589NJ44xSufxyOIVLvC/gaD5O4=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:cc50:: with SMTP id t16mr15688670ilq.88.1638146043212; 
 Sun, 28 Nov 2021 16:34:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 16:33:51 -0800
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4YdKZXoQtr3UucwqvsJdYVKbGG2LUypvn_BNFXApwghg@mail.gmail.com>
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Cc: mikel.irazabal@upc.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Bloat] Preventing RLC Buffer Sojourn Delays in 5G
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:34:04 -0000

A nice comparison of BBR vs Codel vs FIFO vs their cross-layer
solution. (they used irtt!)

I am always puzzled as to why folk don't benchmark fq-codel (or
something like BQL)
in scenarios like these. Are the headers not available in the RAN?
(forgive me for forgetting)

Anyway, their "vanilla" scenario shows 5G with > 1sec of buffering.
Is that real?

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=3D9369375

--=20
I tried to build a better future, a few times:
https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org

Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC