* [Bloat] Announcing Flent (formerly netperf-wrapper) v0.10.0 @ 2015-05-24 13:48 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2015-05-24 16:22 ` Dave Taht 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2015-05-24 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bloat [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2500 bytes --] Hi everyone This is to announce version 0.10.0 of Flent: The FLExible Network Tester (formerly netperf-wrapper). This is the first release under the new name: I'm hoping not too much broke in the transition. A list of changes since v0.9.1 is included below. To install the release, use `pip install flent`. Arch Linux users can install through the AUR. Pre-built packages for Debian and Ubuntu are available from the Open Build Service at https://software.opensuse.org/download.html?project=home:tohojo:flent&package=flent Please report any bugs through Github at https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues Thanks, -Toke List of changes sine v0.9.1: - Package installation should now work through `pip` on most platforms. In addition, two binaries are now installed: `flent` and `flent-gui`. The latter will launch the GUI directly (corresponding to passing --gui to the normal `flent` binary). - The file format has changed. It now uses the .flnt extension and is bzip'ed instead of gzip'ed. In addition, raw data as parsed from the underlying test tools is now always included, but it has been moved outside the 'metadata' key and resides under its own top-level key ('raw_values') in the json object. Finally, the file format is now explicitly versioned, and a compatibility layer has been added so Flent will still load the old .json.gz files. - Test runners can now depend on each other, so one test tool can be made to run when another finishes. In addition, a 'watchdog' feature has been introduced to the runners, so one runner exiting can trigger forceful kill of (an)other runner(s). This can be used along with the new 'timer' runner to enforce a maximum duration of tests, but can also be used with an external script to exit on arbitrary events; for instance when a bandwidth quota is used up. - Flent should now better handle unicode output from test tools under different locales. Fixes bugs on OSX in particular, where output from the `ping` binary can be non-ASCII. - Flent no longer crashes on broken pipe for text-based output formatters. Allows doing things like `flent -o csv | head` without errors. - A couple of new tests has been added: `rrul_50_down`, `rrul_100_up` and `dslreports_8dn`. - A --swap-up-down parameter has been added to swap the meaning of "up" and "down" when running tests. - Various bug fixes. This release announcement is also available on Github: https://github.com/tohojo/flent/releases/tag/v0.10.0 [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 472 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bloat] Announcing Flent (formerly netperf-wrapper) v0.10.0 2015-05-24 13:48 [Bloat] Announcing Flent (formerly netperf-wrapper) v0.10.0 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2015-05-24 16:22 ` Dave Taht [not found] ` <CAA93jw7Cfv8rQxTP4gcZFoziHSvt8fw6zxyeUBdS0Ukn_9VYUA@mail.gmail.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2015-05-24 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen; +Cc: bloat > - A couple of new tests has been added: `rrul_50_down`, `rrul_100_up` These tests also include one saturating stream in the opposite direction, and do not graph many flows very well, as yet. https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/15 The results are "interesting". I have been using these to completely overwhelm the sqm inbound shaper (pie,cake,fq_codel,and a policer all fail to manage the concatinated 2sec comcast queue. Sigh.) Also since we have tons more "flent" servers coming available, testing more flows at more RTTs becomes feasible. https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/36 > and `dslreports_8dn`. This last test is not really baked yet. My intent was to fully emulate the dslreports tests (notably using an http pinger in addition to udp), and use things like the new in-series runner to garner up and down results collected sequentially, and calculate stuff including the "grade". But the form of those tests had not settled down upstream before this release.... Please do not expect binary compatability on the results of these three tests going forward. And: Ideas and Patches always wanted - especially now that the next release window is open! https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues -- Dave Täht Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAA93jw7Cfv8rQxTP4gcZFoziHSvt8fw6zxyeUBdS0Ukn_9VYUA@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: [Bloat] Announcing Flent (formerly netperf-wrapper) v0.10.0 [not found] ` <CAA93jw7Cfv8rQxTP4gcZFoziHSvt8fw6zxyeUBdS0Ukn_9VYUA@mail.gmail.com> @ 2015-05-24 17:14 ` Dave Taht 2015-05-24 17:34 ` Dave Taht 2015-05-25 23:17 ` David Lang 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2015-05-24 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen, bloat um, er ah, can a modern web server or web browser decompress bzip? gzip support is common, and it was always my hope to have a web browser based parser for the output. On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > also, nanog would be good to ping but this announcement is not generic > enough for it. I can do nanog. > > Also you have hopefully collected a lot of addresses from your > travels, like to caida, that are not on the bloat list. > > Best to do an announcement of that sort after you have a mailing list. > I hope to migrate lists.bufferbloat.net to > something new, leveraging your newfound expertise in that area. ;) > > Does stuff install to the mac using pip? > > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: >>> - A couple of new tests has been added: `rrul_50_down`, `rrul_100_up` >> >> These tests also include one saturating stream in the opposite direction, >> and do not graph many flows very well, as yet. >> >> https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/15 >> >> The results are "interesting". I have been using these to completely overwhelm >> the sqm inbound shaper (pie,cake,fq_codel,and a policer all fail to manage >> the concatinated 2sec comcast queue. Sigh.) >> >> Also since we have tons more "flent" servers coming available, testing >> more flows at more RTTs becomes feasible. >> >> https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/36 >> >>> and `dslreports_8dn`. >> >> This last test is not really baked yet. My intent was to fully emulate >> the dslreports tests (notably using an http pinger in addition to udp), and use >> things like the new in-series runner to garner up and down results collected >> sequentially, and calculate stuff including the "grade". But the form of those >> tests had not settled down upstream before this release.... >> >> Please do not expect binary compatability on the results of these >> three tests going forward. >> >> And: Ideas and Patches always wanted - especially now that the next >> release window is open! >> >> https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues >> >> >> -- >> Dave Täht >> Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** >> >> https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67 > > > > -- > Dave Täht > Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** > > https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67 -- Dave Täht Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bloat] Announcing Flent (formerly netperf-wrapper) v0.10.0 2015-05-24 17:14 ` Dave Taht @ 2015-05-24 17:34 ` Dave Taht 2015-05-24 17:55 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2015-05-25 23:17 ` David Lang 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2015-05-24 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen, bloat This contained the never-merged (some licencing issues) web based parser for the data. https://github.com/bipulkkuri/netperf-wrapper On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > um, er ah, can a modern web server or web browser decompress bzip? > gzip support is common, and it was always my hope to have a web > browser based parser for the output. > > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: >> also, nanog would be good to ping but this announcement is not generic >> enough for it. I can do nanog. >> >> Also you have hopefully collected a lot of addresses from your >> travels, like to caida, that are not on the bloat list. >> >> Best to do an announcement of that sort after you have a mailing list. >> I hope to migrate lists.bufferbloat.net to >> something new, leveraging your newfound expertise in that area. ;) >> >> Does stuff install to the mac using pip? >> >> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> - A couple of new tests has been added: `rrul_50_down`, `rrul_100_up` >>> >>> These tests also include one saturating stream in the opposite direction, >>> and do not graph many flows very well, as yet. >>> >>> https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/15 >>> >>> The results are "interesting". I have been using these to completely overwhelm >>> the sqm inbound shaper (pie,cake,fq_codel,and a policer all fail to manage >>> the concatinated 2sec comcast queue. Sigh.) >>> >>> Also since we have tons more "flent" servers coming available, testing >>> more flows at more RTTs becomes feasible. >>> >>> https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/36 >>> >>>> and `dslreports_8dn`. >>> >>> This last test is not really baked yet. My intent was to fully emulate >>> the dslreports tests (notably using an http pinger in addition to udp), and use >>> things like the new in-series runner to garner up and down results collected >>> sequentially, and calculate stuff including the "grade". But the form of those >>> tests had not settled down upstream before this release.... >>> >>> Please do not expect binary compatability on the results of these >>> three tests going forward. >>> >>> And: Ideas and Patches always wanted - especially now that the next >>> release window is open! >>> >>> https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dave Täht >>> Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** >>> >>> https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67 >> >> >> >> -- >> Dave Täht >> Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** >> >> https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67 > > > > -- > Dave Täht > Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** > > https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67 -- Dave Täht Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bloat] Announcing Flent (formerly netperf-wrapper) v0.10.0 2015-05-24 17:34 ` Dave Taht @ 2015-05-24 17:55 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2015-05-24 18:05 ` Dave Taht 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2015-05-24 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Taht; +Cc: bloat Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes: > This contained the never-merged (some licencing issues) web based > parser for the data. > > https://github.com/bipulkkuri/netperf-wrapper The main reason (apart from licensing issues) that it was never merged was that I don't want to maintain two plotting implementations within Flent itself. So the possible scenarios for a web-based viewer are, as I see it, roughly: 1. Leverage the existing matplotlib plotting implementation to produce javascript plots. This is issue #27 (https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/27) and depends on how well the mpl-to-d3 library works in practice. 2. Replace the whole plotting implementation with a javascript-based one, and serve that from within Flent itself. 3. Have an entirely separate web viewer implementation. Which scenario that works best will probably to a large extent depend on the actual use case this mystical beast is supposed to support. Which I don't believe has been articulated properly... -Toke ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bloat] Announcing Flent (formerly netperf-wrapper) v0.10.0 2015-05-24 17:55 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2015-05-24 18:05 ` Dave Taht 2015-05-24 18:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2015-05-24 18:23 ` Dave Taht 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2015-05-24 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen; +Cc: bloat well,1) we need a flent-devel mailing list... no need to have this discussion so widely here.. On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote: > Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes: > >> This contained the never-merged (some licencing issues) web based >> parser for the data. >> >> https://github.com/bipulkkuri/netperf-wrapper > > The main reason (apart from licensing issues) that it was never merged > was that I don't want to maintain two plotting implementations within > Flent itself. So the possible scenarios for a web-based viewer are, as I > see it, roughly: I agree that *you* do not want to maintain two plotting implementations inside flent. But: I am hugely in favor of various implementations of stuff that can read the file format and do various (new and interesting) things with it. The number of python-matplotlib capable developers is small. The number of javascript capable developers (and web based plotting tools) is huge. Other means of dealing with the data (postgres json) are also needed. So the json.gz file format WAS readable and translatable by many web servers and browsers, flent is not (so far as I know, even with adding a mime type.) I liked the original web based prototype, it needed a db back end, but it seemed like a promising start. > 1. Leverage the existing matplotlib plotting implementation to produce > javascript plots. This is issue #27 > (https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/27) and depends on how well > the mpl-to-d3 library works in practice. I don't have a lot of hope for the canvas approach, personally. Too many abstractions. > > 2. Replace the whole plotting implementation with a javascript-based > one, and serve that from within Flent itself. No, trying to optimize for local full throttle use make the tool most useful for core developers. > > 3. Have an entirely separate web viewer implementation. > > > Which scenario that works best will probably to a large extent depend on > the actual use case this mystical beast is supposed to support. Which I > don't believe has been articulated properly... All three could be done. (with sufficient developers with sufficient skillsets with sufficient funding) Personally what I most prefer is that the "expert" implementation be blazing fast! The third option makes it more possible to share and compare the results over many browser types and OSes, including (ugh) windows. > -Toke -- Dave Täht Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bloat] Announcing Flent (formerly netperf-wrapper) v0.10.0 2015-05-24 18:05 ` Dave Taht @ 2015-05-24 18:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2015-05-24 18:34 ` Dave Taht 2015-05-29 6:09 ` Sebastian Moeller 2015-05-24 18:23 ` Dave Taht 1 sibling, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2015-05-24 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Taht; +Cc: bloat Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes: > well,1) we need a flent-devel mailing list... no need to have this > discussion so widely here.. Yup, will try to set one up soonish. ENOTIME so far. > I agree that *you* do not want to maintain two plotting > implementations inside flent. But: > > I am hugely in favor of various implementations of stuff that can read > the file format and do various (new and interesting) things with it. > The number of python-matplotlib capable developers is small. The > number of javascript capable developers (and web based plotting tools) > is huge. Other means of dealing with the data (postgres json) are also > needed. Oh, sure, quite happy with more implementations. That was option 3. However, until someone actually starts working on such an implementation this is all hypothetical. I'm happy to discuss interoperability issues when such an implementation actually materialises :) > So the json.gz file format WAS readable and translatable by many web > servers and browsers, flent is not (so far as I know, even with adding > a mime type.) Yes, but .json.gz also makes it hard to distinguish from other random gzip'ed json data. I'd rather have a separate file extension for offline storage, and then solve the web problem as a separate problem, which as far as I'm concerned is orthogonal to the encoding of the files on disk. The important thing is the structure of the JSON object, not which compression format and file extension it is stored in. > I liked the original web based prototype, it needed a db back end, but > it seemed like a promising start. And odds are that db back end is going to store the JSON object in its own encoding anyway, hence rendering this whole discussion moot... :) > I don't have a lot of hope for the canvas approach, personally. Too > many abstractions. Yeah, I'm sceptical, but willing to give it the benefit of the doubt if it means I have to write less code... > Personally what I most prefer is that the "expert" implementation be > blazing fast! Yes, well, matplotlib is not exactly a cheetah... -Toke ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bloat] Announcing Flent (formerly netperf-wrapper) v0.10.0 2015-05-24 18:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2015-05-24 18:34 ` Dave Taht 2015-05-29 6:09 ` Sebastian Moeller 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2015-05-24 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen; +Cc: bloat On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote: > Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes: > >> well,1) we need a flent-devel mailing list... no need to have this >> discussion so widely here.. > > Yup, will try to set one up soonish. ENOTIME so far. > >> I agree that *you* do not want to maintain two plotting >> implementations inside flent. But: >> >> I am hugely in favor of various implementations of stuff that can read >> the file format and do various (new and interesting) things with it. >> The number of python-matplotlib capable developers is small. The >> number of javascript capable developers (and web based plotting tools) >> is huge. Other means of dealing with the data (postgres json) are also >> needed. > > Oh, sure, quite happy with more implementations. That was option 3. > However, until someone actually starts working on such an implementation > this is all hypothetical. I'm happy to discuss interoperability issues > when such an implementation actually materialises :) Well, no. Usually we discuss interop issues in file and wire formats in light of *possible* implementations... and a web implementation of some plotting tools is a highly desirable implementation. >> So the json.gz file format WAS readable and translatable by many web >> servers and browsers, flent is not (so far as I know, even with adding >> a mime type.) > > Yes, but .json.gz also makes it hard to distinguish from other random > gzip'ed json data. All in favor of .flent.gz. and .flent.bz. Not .flent the compressed json encoded format. > I'd rather have a separate file extension for offline > storage, and then solve the web problem as a separate problem, which as > far as I'm concerned is orthogonal to the encoding of the files on disk. > The important thing is the structure of the JSON object, not which > compression format and file extension it is stored in. > >> I liked the original web based prototype, it needed a db back end, but >> it seemed like a promising start. > > And odds are that db back end is going to store the JSON object in its > own encoding anyway, hence rendering this whole discussion moot... :) And odds are that the db backend would only store the metadata and not the raw data. >> I don't have a lot of hope for the canvas approach, personally. Too >> many abstractions. > > Yeah, I'm sceptical, but willing to give it the benefit of the doubt if > it means I have to write less code... Goal here is to make it as easy as possible for *others* to write code. >> Personally what I most prefer is that the "expert" implementation be >> blazing fast! > > Yes, well, matplotlib is not exactly a cheetah... Yes, on my bad days, waiting for 100+ plots to render on my 16 core box, I dream of rewriting the whole thing in go and parallizing the hell out of it, for starters. > > -Toke -- Dave Täht Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bloat] Announcing Flent (formerly netperf-wrapper) v0.10.0 2015-05-24 18:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2015-05-24 18:34 ` Dave Taht @ 2015-05-29 6:09 ` Sebastian Moeller 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Sebastian Moeller @ 2015-05-29 6:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen; +Cc: bloat On May 24, 2015, at 20:16 , Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote: [...] > >> So the json.gz file format WAS readable and translatable by many web >> servers and browsers, flent is not (so far as I know, even with adding >> a mime type.) > > Yes, but .json.gz also makes it hard to distinguish from other random > gzip'ed json data. I'd rather have a separate file extension for offline > storage, and then solve the web problem as a separate problem, which as > far as I'm concerned is orthogonal to the encoding of the files on disk. > The important thing is the structure of the JSON object, not which > compression format and file extension it is stored in. […] *.flent.json.gz ? Best Regards Sebastian ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bloat] Announcing Flent (formerly netperf-wrapper) v0.10.0 2015-05-24 18:05 ` Dave Taht 2015-05-24 18:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2015-05-24 18:23 ` Dave Taht 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2015-05-24 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen; +Cc: bloat so far as I know browsers will autonegotiate gzip compression on the wire or in the server. I do not believe (but am woefully out of date on this) bzip can be handled in the browser. http://redmine.lighttpd.net/projects/1/wiki/docs_modcompress http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_deflate.html So my vote is that the native flent format be pure text json (with a mime type mapping it to that) and the default output of flent be flent.gz where it can be automagically decoded when presented with whatever.flent and the .gz file exists instead. And ya still have time to fix it before casting the bzip'd version in stone. I am not big on fixing all the web browsers and servers in the world for "yet another specialized mime type". Even if javacript based decompressors exist for bzip, gzip was the most common format back when i was paying attention (8 years ago). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bloat] Announcing Flent (formerly netperf-wrapper) v0.10.0 2015-05-24 17:14 ` Dave Taht 2015-05-24 17:34 ` Dave Taht @ 2015-05-25 23:17 ` David Lang 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: David Lang @ 2015-05-25 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Taht; +Cc: bloat [-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2893 bytes --] xz is both faster and better compression than bzip, so unless there is browser support for bzip and not xz, bzip should be skipped. David Lang On Sun, 24 May 2015, Dave Taht wrote: > um, er ah, can a modern web server or web browser decompress bzip? > gzip support is common, and it was always my hope to have a web > browser based parser for the output. > > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: >> also, nanog would be good to ping but this announcement is not generic >> enough for it. I can do nanog. >> >> Also you have hopefully collected a lot of addresses from your >> travels, like to caida, that are not on the bloat list. >> >> Best to do an announcement of that sort after you have a mailing list. >> I hope to migrate lists.bufferbloat.net to >> something new, leveraging your newfound expertise in that area. ;) >> >> Does stuff install to the mac using pip? >> >> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> - A couple of new tests has been added: `rrul_50_down`, `rrul_100_up` >>> >>> These tests also include one saturating stream in the opposite direction, >>> and do not graph many flows very well, as yet. >>> >>> https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/15 >>> >>> The results are "interesting". I have been using these to completely overwhelm >>> the sqm inbound shaper (pie,cake,fq_codel,and a policer all fail to manage >>> the concatinated 2sec comcast queue. Sigh.) >>> >>> Also since we have tons more "flent" servers coming available, testing >>> more flows at more RTTs becomes feasible. >>> >>> https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/36 >>> >>>> and `dslreports_8dn`. >>> >>> This last test is not really baked yet. My intent was to fully emulate >>> the dslreports tests (notably using an http pinger in addition to udp), and use >>> things like the new in-series runner to garner up and down results collected >>> sequentially, and calculate stuff including the "grade". But the form of those >>> tests had not settled down upstream before this release.... >>> >>> Please do not expect binary compatability on the results of these >>> three tests going forward. >>> >>> And: Ideas and Patches always wanted - especially now that the next >>> release window is open! >>> >>> https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dave Täht >>> Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** >>> >>> https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67 >> >> >> >> -- >> Dave Täht >> Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** >> >> https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67 > > > > -- > Dave Täht > Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** > > https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67 > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-05-29 6:10 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-05-24 13:48 [Bloat] Announcing Flent (formerly netperf-wrapper) v0.10.0 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2015-05-24 16:22 ` Dave Taht [not found] ` <CAA93jw7Cfv8rQxTP4gcZFoziHSvt8fw6zxyeUBdS0Ukn_9VYUA@mail.gmail.com> 2015-05-24 17:14 ` Dave Taht 2015-05-24 17:34 ` Dave Taht 2015-05-24 17:55 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2015-05-24 18:05 ` Dave Taht 2015-05-24 18:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2015-05-24 18:34 ` Dave Taht 2015-05-29 6:09 ` Sebastian Moeller 2015-05-24 18:23 ` Dave Taht 2015-05-25 23:17 ` David Lang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox