From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Bloat] Fwd: [IP] Measuring broadband performance...or not?
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 10:06:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4obAhCvyvci1p2ifjU_DpGp_fsJ37aNQULkF4XAovKXg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80A8CB75-43E5-4E4E-967B-ADEF954ED112@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2145 bytes --]
Although I liked that this document mentioned latency 10 times, not
measuring latency *with load* is like measuring the safety of a car only
when it is parked.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Farber <farber@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 20, 2015 at 6:55 AM
Subject: [IP] Measuring broadband performance...or not?
To: ip <ip@listbox.com>
Begin forwarded message:
*From: *Suzanne Johnson <fuhn@pobox.com>
*Subject: **Measuring broadband performance...or not?*
*Date: *May 20, 2015 at 9:32:35 AM EDT
*To: *"DAVID J. FARBER" <dave@farber.net>
Why Is It So Dang Difficult To Get Accurate Information About
Broadband Speeds?
Your cable company sells you a broadband plan advertising download speeds
of “up to 25Mbps.” But it feels sluggish to you so you check out an online
speed test site and it tells you you’re only getting a fraction of that
speed. Then the FCC comes out with its Measuring Broadband America report
which — if you can even make heads or tails of it — says your ISP is
actually exceeding its advertised download speeds. Why don’t all of these
things agree?
A new report [PDF
<https://consumermediallc.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/669739.pdf>] from the
Government Accountability Office finds that while there are multiple
sources for information on broadband performance, there is disagreement
about exactly what information should be shared and how to present it.
.....clip
http://consumerist.com/2015/05/15/why-is-it-so-dang-difficult-to-get-accurate-information-about-broadband-speeds/
Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now>
<https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/26973280-5ba6a701> | Modify
<https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=26973280&id_secret=26973280-3b04af21>
Your Subscription | Unsubscribe Now
<https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=26973280&id_secret=26973280-063e9b28&post_id=20150520095517:D39CCCAE-FEF7-11E4-B297-AEFB9996D0A2>
<http://www.listbox.com>
--
Dave Täht
Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware**
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5471 bytes --]
parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-20 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <80A8CB75-43E5-4E4E-967B-ADEF954ED112@gmail.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw4obAhCvyvci1p2ifjU_DpGp_fsJ37aNQULkF4XAovKXg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox