* [Bloat] determinism
@ 2022-03-29 15:53 Dave Taht
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2022-03-29 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bloat
I note that I really like the determinism in fq-codel, mostly.
recently though, we had a result where fq-pie did better. I am fond of
imagery, like this... but am not going to explain the underlying
problem.
https://twitter.com/amazing_physics/status/1508677956595552257
--
I tried to build a better future, a few times:
https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-03-29 15:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-03-29 15:53 [Bloat] determinism Dave Taht
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox