General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Graph of bloat
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 09:32:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4uG3fNJR=GEf=XcATyX6_Lvt-_xns7kE-OFF7HwTJC8A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559D4BCA.5040907@gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/07/15 17:55, Dave Taht wrote:
>> That is a very interesting graph! Does ntp adjust system time backward
>> based on getting nearly all it's samples with well over a 1/2 second
>> of induced delay?
>
> If there is a consistent asymmetrical delay then yes.
>
> If the delay asymmetry is not persistent (but only occurs during up or
> downloads) then the so-called huff-n-puff filter can be used to factor
> it out.
>
> https://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/huffpuff.html

Judging from that graphic... I don't think huff and puff was designed
for the bufferbloated era! so the question remains, in hal's tests,
did ntp adjust the clock backwards?


> Jan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat



-- 
Dave Täht
worldwide bufferbloat report:
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat
And:
What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone?
https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-08 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-08 10:23 Hal Murray
2015-07-08 15:55 ` Dave Taht
2015-07-08 16:11   ` Jan Ceuleers
2015-07-08 16:29     ` Jan Ceuleers
2015-07-08 19:09       ` Alan Jenkins
2015-07-08 16:32     ` Dave Taht [this message]
2015-07-09 10:08       ` Jan Ceuleers
2015-07-08 17:53   ` Rich Brown
2015-07-09 10:07   ` Hal Murray
2015-07-09 10:55     ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-07-09 18:27       ` Hal Murray
2015-07-09 15:08     ` Dave Taht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw4uG3fNJR=GEf=XcATyX6_Lvt-_xns7kE-OFF7HwTJC8A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=jan.ceuleers@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox