From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Graph of bloat
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 09:32:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4uG3fNJR=GEf=XcATyX6_Lvt-_xns7kE-OFF7HwTJC8A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559D4BCA.5040907@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/07/15 17:55, Dave Taht wrote:
>> That is a very interesting graph! Does ntp adjust system time backward
>> based on getting nearly all it's samples with well over a 1/2 second
>> of induced delay?
>
> If there is a consistent asymmetrical delay then yes.
>
> If the delay asymmetry is not persistent (but only occurs during up or
> downloads) then the so-called huff-n-puff filter can be used to factor
> it out.
>
> https://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/huffpuff.html
Judging from that graphic... I don't think huff and puff was designed
for the bufferbloated era! so the question remains, in hal's tests,
did ntp adjust the clock backwards?
> Jan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
--
Dave Täht
worldwide bufferbloat report:
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat
And:
What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone?
https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-08 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-08 10:23 Hal Murray
2015-07-08 15:55 ` Dave Taht
2015-07-08 16:11 ` Jan Ceuleers
2015-07-08 16:29 ` Jan Ceuleers
2015-07-08 19:09 ` Alan Jenkins
2015-07-08 16:32 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2015-07-09 10:08 ` Jan Ceuleers
2015-07-08 17:53 ` Rich Brown
2015-07-09 10:07 ` Hal Murray
2015-07-09 10:55 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-07-09 18:27 ` Hal Murray
2015-07-09 15:08 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAA93jw4uG3fNJR=GEf=XcATyX6_Lvt-_xns7kE-OFF7HwTJC8A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=jan.ceuleers@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox