From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-oi0-x232.google.com (mail-oi0-x232.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::232])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29CAF21F209
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oift201 with SMTP id t201so94948673oif.3
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=w+z2hi4Qk4ccgmhjuBoFdX+4Z3aW5JTumL90JJ38LtA=;
	b=nYWuUbg4og9MlXyldGv7nzY0Bw1fMKzyWLgV/vfoK7boBUO5LkHWXnZOUkaRpM+IZv
	kCr7SMiY0iktPDeAsUSWzxk0t2NvPeXGJVanX3ztCB0dogFx3Hrf0u4ZygboPqEOd27c
	Hvlh9boU9DNj0EkFRhKtdEq1+g6XQCF/E29N5V2+r1FA8cCsIl1/lRHjOpK4Rwq+stZm
	KHvXBpGQKiVkcTKym3LV8Ih8V3y1YRWaqBIh3Xy2dxGmpIr1oo5bCyDOui5FIVuio6sV
	2NLmSREdO1naxlnS2RqstkEIAM0mizokgyjG1/L0QTl51JrocmaZrYT2U+F+DzyTDEiS
	xVig==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.103.36 with SMTP id ft4mt8787393oeb.39.1430155181480;
	Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.71.139 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:19:41 -0700
X-Google-Profiles: ANGjdJ9eL3NvxWzA7QOLor6UNin8mluiB-B9fBxKBA4iw_bbx0V0hFzUtZJ7gDZfqSjpuayqIRt0fh6_N8sohlOWpiNSgD4jMk2Frlg4cUklmPuvOkpWWNmY9iORN_U
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4vAiYcc-b23xpZqYWasKVRPn2TGw8HcBg2n6_jUwq5rA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>, 
	"Mat Ford (Google+)" <reply-110278001342819324593@profiles.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Bloat] very nice article on the new dslreports test
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:20:15 -0000

http://www.internetsociety.org/blog/tech-matters/2015/04/measure-your-buffe=
rbloat-new-browser-based-tool-dslreports

thx mat!

In reading that it occurred to me that by the bufferbloat community
actually using the test with systems with the bufferbloat fixes in
them, we'd be skewing the results.

It would be kind of nice to be able to attach an addendum or
additional notes to the test result - say with a drop down like:

Queue management technology: [none, fifo, qos, red, sfq, codel,
fq_codel, cake, pie, custom]

and comments field.


--=20
Dave T=C3=A4ht
Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware**

https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67