From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ea0-f171.google.com (mail-ea0-f171.google.com [209.85.215.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F19F21F0FC for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 03:21:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ea0-f171.google.com with SMTP id k14so2401621eaa.16 for ; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 03:21:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KwEh7latASga+znvH9jfKz3oE6id8LDWms4yQnkpGzY=; b=PHAVVqDm+dXMf12yyLRJYME9pVORH5Pm8we8jFtXvCgdP6Ysc7YnYSLK6N+h/scrqV sIEcpCTxEV2Nwbx5k8GaoccY9muTbBslbIK/PSHSfjtyDc1jrSs7Z0M/0tr4E8PkUNUm kxC+YF9HJOWEs1xaJ2sdDGiWXRPeL7fav60Rvm+niRM8pq9hbVLDNEvh/NNMZx5nxwxM qsVylDoYlcWtR0ir86Onh2nv4Z9Saa1Qr2tRiXZA+jY1ez3l9b+/t73RD6r3qTM6SKTs EXtw3IbSWNwsBZsfyTQKVkG1bB8VwmLTXdEOp6gLCzsZFgBBG6o4TiWAgbxm18SDsruG 5oUQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.174.194 with SMTP id x42mr25771379eel.22.1352028086968; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 03:21:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.180.10 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 03:21:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 12:21:26 +0100 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: bloat Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Bloat] bufferbloat in chinese X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 11:21:29 -0000 re: http://tieba.baidu.com/p/1961926857 The translation of this rant about bufferbloat in simplified han was interesting, but I think something was lost by google translate's attempt at it. Could someone attempt a better translation? "Vulgar unbearable China Telecom not only hijacked the normal DNS resolution, virtual cluster experiments found today, they seem to use a mysterious technical limitations subnet number of terminals to access the external network, but no solution for internal network devices NAT, I wonder if they multifunctional gift cat inside tricks. Tomorrow do a VPN dial-up can be a home server, and have to say that the telecommunications increasingly ruthless ... being monthly spend is worth dozens of pieces for his operation of a 7X24 home server before the DNS cache buffer server and proxy cache server, it seems tomorrow VPN capabilities plus ..." --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html