From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38CB221F1C8 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:36:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id l18so175369wgh.4 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:36:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gRUOg+nsjRaDYvHUop7FoRRBiqdsGd4jTml7Nr+/ZF4=; b=aPpm3Hm9JG7y3UJ1xKRdEsYIcrvTgvcgGXBMV38SI+igaNTTBgCAeiFD41bb08C4wf TzszVXZdm2+vUqF04Q8lDcDuC5m7tVoBeuAuvr9SKjALlcNsnHjCYJ0EYoDVVeefV7JJ eYo0shC+gJcgaG1AcN0x7Z7V1hrJJ2DPFFXMkICMTn/gCmA7ycNeb1wBDoZw+eI0/71o heIYG8imi/Dj7430+666W4mHY+UVZdMhhD97rsaxfBa0N5AdBuiDSk1Fj+3yc1HH2E9q IlbK/bNrLEVFz/Ib0WHs7wHR8cEj9nQdMHk21ZmNIGC4QtPp+PpDKkjpVTLPnZJTQz5w qmhQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.206.172 with SMTP id lp12mr192914wic.46.1392928609193; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:36:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.8.1 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:36:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:36:49 -0500 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: "aqm@ietf.org" , bloat Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Bloat] Arris thoughts on bufferbloat in the CMTS X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 20:36:51 -0000 I finally got my SCTE proceedings today. In there were a presentation and paper by Arris's CTO and several of his senior engineers... http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/trimfat/Cloonan_Paper.pdf http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/trimfat/Cloonan_Presentation.pdf There are some very good ideas and analysis in here, a nice enhancement to SFQ easily implementable in hardware, and a new version of RED, called "LRED". In a first reading, there are a few things I quibble with (they missed the SQF-like portion of fq_codel entirely, for example), but it is really nice to have seen Jim's paper go from "so-called" in 2011, to "seminal" in 2013. These are worth reading thoroughly. I will wait until saturday to comment further. --=20 Dave T=E4ht