* [Bloat] Blog post: "Do packet drops matter for TCP"
@ 2019-06-07 16:30 Stephen Hemminger
2019-06-07 17:10 ` Dave Taht
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2019-06-07 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Taht; +Cc: bloat
Good summary of bufferbloat from network operator point of view.
https://blog.ipspace.net/2019/06/do-packet-drops-matter-for-tcp.html?ck_subscriber_id=182966812
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bloat] Blog post: "Do packet drops matter for TCP"
2019-06-07 16:30 [Bloat] Blog post: "Do packet drops matter for TCP" Stephen Hemminger
@ 2019-06-07 17:10 ` Dave Taht
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2019-06-07 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger; +Cc: bloat, Ivan Pepelnjak
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 9:30 AM Stephen Hemminger
<stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
> Good summary of bufferbloat from network operator point of view.
Thanks stephen!
> https://blog.ipspace.net/2019/06/do-packet-drops-matter-for-tcp.html?ck_subscriber_id=182966812
One of these years ivan will mention fq_codel in a sentence. From a
network operator's perspective:
fq_codel ensures statistical multiplexing
fq_codel ensures that congestion control algorithms across many flows
fate share faster
fq_codel is more robust against packet floods
fq_codel is safer to use ecn with
anything else?
--
Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-205-9740
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-07 17:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-06-07 16:30 [Bloat] Blog post: "Do packet drops matter for TCP" Stephen Hemminger
2019-06-07 17:10 ` Dave Taht
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox