* [Bloat] Blog post: "Do packet drops matter for TCP" @ 2019-06-07 16:30 Stephen Hemminger 2019-06-07 17:10 ` Dave Taht 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2019-06-07 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Taht; +Cc: bloat Good summary of bufferbloat from network operator point of view. https://blog.ipspace.net/2019/06/do-packet-drops-matter-for-tcp.html?ck_subscriber_id=182966812 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bloat] Blog post: "Do packet drops matter for TCP" 2019-06-07 16:30 [Bloat] Blog post: "Do packet drops matter for TCP" Stephen Hemminger @ 2019-06-07 17:10 ` Dave Taht 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2019-06-07 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Hemminger; +Cc: bloat, Ivan Pepelnjak On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 9:30 AM Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote: > > Good summary of bufferbloat from network operator point of view. Thanks stephen! > https://blog.ipspace.net/2019/06/do-packet-drops-matter-for-tcp.html?ck_subscriber_id=182966812 One of these years ivan will mention fq_codel in a sentence. From a network operator's perspective: fq_codel ensures statistical multiplexing fq_codel ensures that congestion control algorithms across many flows fate share faster fq_codel is more robust against packet floods fq_codel is safer to use ecn with anything else? -- Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-205-9740 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-07 17:10 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-06-07 16:30 [Bloat] Blog post: "Do packet drops matter for TCP" Stephen Hemminger 2019-06-07 17:10 ` Dave Taht
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox