From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x22e.google.com (mail-qt0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56E103BA8D for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:22:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qt0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id w20so176109796qtb.1 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:22:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YP8hbWyjRzb5gETt1PxUtsYqPIXwwJYopEbWeKqz/n4=; b=MFY8z0hcFuF5n2FkS88VBHcVjDuCOLcpIUBCOrsoCsqifS5LL2JyiQvn8PbV13sbST uSFAeFNfdzRCnjIPX9tpw7M47Qjs/zWCKhygCdZ0AQfivc/QohPV+2lW20PBFdIaV4M8 DgScrORVs52YHRcrljmktjlL2nVna3Wu6b+9xXn6/k4bwEULv8eP0zUohehwE9DfqiRL IH6uNNonHae1+OvdVOkiVoxw8e8L6fLbRkl/aXhlYC+uGWTEsAi1nPJLa4rdvDCbTzuI BwQtvIWSpzMFgiFNbV4CNJOtF4xBIoQcg8uCBtGQuZmwcaQw/y8sqo9jBtIrGoVfNGsC EoAg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YP8hbWyjRzb5gETt1PxUtsYqPIXwwJYopEbWeKqz/n4=; b=LGHnkIKzcmQP8oj/tyla9i4E143J19naQ6MmIoyq7/HHd2oAcN6b6I3Jjet8Y42OTE hTqHL6C3GCnkQu/yoPK3uyYoWGgJTuBopnGCe2Aze9WTzOPjp9edzuXRfAb1dc9jnTGW 8sv8n5/ZPFuQPkKuseuF1cf6SnfGE5Ehem9kRrQFwL0reRf8gd0c/c115KM/fI1sMKqD q1ubGgz8UjX++BwQRud2T7kfOVC/D62SfxyDCMmIYYnRrzBbWrwE9ICCfhISSkz63sNh 102/WvsT97LJ2cx3zxjZW5/XVvVI9Uu/Kd2lQq/iP3dIMWdgZMRsWQ91o2Y9Thq568mu IlmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKEo+MxIqyySZ+/nTDSO/bEuNefh0RQseVTtESXobKkouRMH7mvmRdz2JG1nnO/Hv0X8r1Bqhhhx8nLsw== X-Received: by 10.200.42.200 with SMTP id c8mr29073307qta.156.1485894124844; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:22:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.142.132 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:22:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Dave Taht Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:22:04 -0800 Message-ID: To: Aaron Wood Cc: bloat Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Bloat] I have a new record for bloat X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:22:05 -0000 As for my best-ever winner for an ISP test under load, this is cake compared against sonic.net's default router for their fiber network connecting from SF to my box in fremont (10 hops). http://www.taht.net/~d/sonic_106_cake_vs_default.png We're talking a max of 1.5ms extra induced jitter under load here... on a 4ms path... and actually latency is reduced once the link gets going. I sort of now need to do a strictly voip/videoconference test with no other traffic on the link because of the gpon related acquire/release delays... but the jamophone seems more feasible by the day. (I managed to get it closer to 100% of the uplink later)