From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ob0-x231.google.com (mail-ob0-x231.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::231])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0897A21F411;
	Sun, 10 May 2015 10:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obcus9 with SMTP id us9so56324086obc.2;
	Sun, 10 May 2015 10:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=BciNuHPym4dzqu9wxlnlJhS+9uL5O7eIRSOan9ysVWs=;
	b=FfUqs6hcGwACcVvslLPzKdx2CSt3A9lvHBvT8jhnu/kw9K1En7LL8ir5im2aOV006p
	S0usJ4SFguzVT/9s/IAsp/EApuzYspp7EDtNDMNnqelRQu49tXTzvYyD1i5fIDPPQBai
	tC6hUOM8nYY4GPiywWq9oCvMSOczOymw+KADUNH8zwz16y6Bc8sMvbUhVOVV1fwLS0h/
	lLZzA6fqC5LE65USdW/5/EEvDkVI5FAOwk4vVD2I/KGTDaTTB/exSqvc22ZPXAvRwEKl
	0YJOxqM08MXLJCdigryvJ2RXd6yj/DekwO34DYWeaWwR3y80llt7kYzknXFcvJK8I99q
	0Gdw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.4.133 with SMTP id 127mr5098791oie.11.1431280685698;
	Sun, 10 May 2015 10:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.71.139 with HTTP; Sun, 10 May 2015 10:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5D9E2jPDcuChvAqhLajHgesNucBS4Xn6dSQERmLkOb7g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJq5cE35ptd-P=EPB4-qhnfVZiMmXWUFL4jD2_BxUUCvU2ACGw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw6rKLzSVJ_BsMS+xUnSvtC4GTKVK4fEYoyNS91OztEeeQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CE133109-7BBD-4BBC-AF41-864B6AA4F541@gmx.de>
	<CAA93jw5D9E2jPDcuChvAqhLajHgesNucBS4Xn6dSQERmLkOb7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 10:58:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA93jw5SZ4W1Y919HZ1-FEqhZZMxZzJJg_6wSQw+R_owpF27oQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>,
	"codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Codel] [Cake] Control theory and congestion control
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 17:58:47 -0000

This was that patch against the https://github.com/dtaht/sch_cake repo.

http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/cake_reduced_target/0001-sch_cake-add-experimental-decreasing-target-at-100-p.patch

(I am not seriously proposing this for anything... but I am loving
having cake be out of the main linux tree. I can have a new idea, make
a change to the algo, compile, test in a matter of seconds, and/or run
a comprehensive netperf-wrapper suite over a cup of coffee, and then
try something else)...

there is something of a backlog of new ideas on the cake mailing list
and elsewhere.

I guess I should track the random ideas in branches in the github repo.