From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x22e.google.com (mail-qt0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15BBE3B2A4 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 16:53:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qt0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id l33-v6so16462578qta.11 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 13:53:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=68qChGi1HQZDXfy2PhLrXo4QvkWqOs5JT+pg4/6w5mc=; b=uIk6lVaI8Yy5mkYvwaLeT0Ltk4Nbl9K04ML/mX5euuzPElSKud11hka14MgEhJinbi krHiS0q48yaCofYUffTn5IwUF+5trlbffEBZkx1MLwmIFoOPlDMs2aAijmjR1zPVEHK6 AmXZoO9tbS578Qz/viGYsxoRxsHgVotIt0mYdsTsq3NMCGsN25i+PXFndCOE3SKQFXb8 9F34q4Cbb5nYLJjH3qxv2aNYSaMvDS/l0rLpAfKTXxLrzxfVPfn7TltAVTwvWN1w6uWd KAFwYe2daTS5xICzgGOlRB1iJywe0SkofBCNJtaYspkrfNJHCWE+GFgaA7yFEa9oMArb m4Qg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=68qChGi1HQZDXfy2PhLrXo4QvkWqOs5JT+pg4/6w5mc=; b=O7YyYARAnEcbZ3XEEr7B5v5fVjBJfVLzUtV6slEBMgM4EVrI6wIOFEJ1EOYaH1Fiig cNDBjZTuhVzAl80xigpIKiFzccaoSfqz1uiJeMR+/srVo5nNbpNzHgMyYUyZ+TcCRxxV Mecs8SimCkFi7oXUAiqPyIHh+wBRKkHcqaWdVGr7EYJZljOeGsmvM6b0KoSqy5Z5A0Ks VmN+u1AVII06LPx9Nl20/8KBdOs007De3y12czQHYJMteLo02/IDji63GTWB6H++KGd7 uUZRMLl/3FAPhtQQXyAjYdqFJP2aulRCweFtAIBOm0lzrRGe88u3L4nO/4cZ1jn4ycgw 1i6w== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E10i6yuXtmPJt6HC3TVDX3Ff3y1aRH0ufRtYGg2f5jnLaWYErLi 1PmJdMTNod9SdRYot/ckCZCPx9S0dYWupKcu4jiPxg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKItON/4BbjyrDTtUGYmCPt/szNf686wTQuZqPWCewUFiuj50gQradp20z59U6N2uh/rz/YxG/AfberDOIUqvaE= X-Received: by 2002:aed:24fb:: with SMTP id u56-v6mr12705407qtc.203.1529355236450; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 13:53:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ac8:540f:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 13:53:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Dave Taht Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 13:53:54 -0700 Message-ID: To: bloat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Bloat] vesper and page load time X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 20:53:57 -0000 while I'm finishing catching up on current research, vesper looked good, especially in its analysis of how various various methods are for calculating PLT. "The surprising aspect of the results is that the differences between the metrics are so noticeable. As shown in Figures 2(a) and 3, the differences are large in terms of percentage (24.0%=E2=80=9364.3%); more importantly, the differences are large in terms of absolute magnitude, equating to hundreds or thousands of milliseconds" http://web.mit.edu/ravinet/vesper_nsdi18.pdf --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-669-226-2619