From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x22d.google.com (mail-qt0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2546F3B29E for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:17:32 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qt0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id m59so20320012qte.11 for ; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 11:17:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9kYsOe72XSudogxmbKp0FL78uDfVjgjcEaK89G9m3Y4=; b=eta6rNnHcMCsHFm6J56hSnCuVRwDmmc3/Z/pGa1n36Kd47f4IbY0hleCO+W2kyP08Y HHE0Lip3RY4d6GZltCSip71EAsfYhbEHX2w9e0nUNdgUY9gc7k7KrI+1hiZ+P2FV6kkl HvVtpgKiJMtbB0GK4sDonf+mwF9MOujkymobU9BgYP/CFluuNB1E5E4ygwNAxju5Q7E1 zcJIJ3LIhFta4KNxdqkoHF9UPSRHTxaoy9ADzzmTkHzVGeT41pa7jwKr7m5IxsVvceuQ ojP5zasIqgQ3MXMgOIK1z62h78jmN3/Hxd9JpBYCGcv8HJB1uKRJVdSRYQ5LC5FSHbEQ MMmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9kYsOe72XSudogxmbKp0FL78uDfVjgjcEaK89G9m3Y4=; b=BMDxYuhuu3aqjDyqdqiUGEOfYRicEFqXomF3DfzNaj+7qebvSTsQv8ezSr6FpdeTMi SnS5YZvjz/eIQRX8IP5tL1cszBwZSmBsysz20boqo48nkdGW2VoRTO/ZWjzmseg1zI87 YwAXkI0bkAlz170HIGT0/s1yfCm35Womb0/ieE19pf3hRE4Dk/rltePSi3voDNmdrZ2Q 8bhsUMMKHdSH40SlGBGuIWuSsCJnZziBRIUE3nj32WWWKVAc5+xGayj+5gR5lG+wZ09H //PzOiu4cAhNohLVpF/ufKU1idBEVmZ5BM/KNmTbJ+M8MZilzfoQAjFyTH3TT47hIR6w HJYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mK87+QN+rnoCAcU7tEzKH1YqpZRlSMAi88lR9iWi3/9UjN4xrKU x9BL5pFZjwais2sDqVzYBMbKxaPNyePQ1jzjmc4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZo8tytis/M6lPSeD/KLpP2nrTXaSlNdIBcKdIQ5e1O9DuQ8GV2mRcROZyAHQGqa0M9U4SfMk+vd9hh+lRGdmA= X-Received: by 10.55.201.155 with SMTP id m27mr31536089qkl.299.1512674251680; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 11:17:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.193.93 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 11:17:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1512673617.2361.50.camel@fcal.uner.edu.ar> References: <1512673617.2361.50.camel@fcal.uner.edu.ar> From: Dave Taht Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 11:17:31 -0800 Message-ID: To: "Carlos R. Pasqualini" Cc: bloat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Bloat] Self-hosted speed test X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 19:17:32 -0000 All the servers need for basic flent testing is netperf (netserver). Other tools like irtt are helpful. The problem with flent's toolset in comparison with your suggestion is that having a browser based test is useful. However, we have generally found browser based tests to be increasingly inaccurate at speeds > 40Mbit.