From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-x232.google.com (mail-qa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D2CE21F19A for ; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 10:18:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id cm18so8209559qab.37 for ; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 10:18:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XPHowCC2Y6bTx1NzhnLTZ7mB1Ng1HF5lrtCnGm03YCU=; b=gjzCi/Td3yDS2Vou/sPi/UiIg4XDYiKxIT70JcCnATn9IQVs9Y3SOVLVYDgnr9iuTv 05M6YIBbpUaQr9qT9ty1wpMOvNipoh2ON5eI/xGCcI+bV5ABPKl027hiSd/eIRxytiGN eo+av/Bzc+YKX89IdPy3iJVKaOimhJp9RhVIMI9Lctl0yWmxLLaj0tWl8hvbvFiPrS/2 hHDjapAjym78hOvH7L9FKI/uiEvCkqQrvk1gMdX7cTbz4Cp3/4nNE9qy1fABak67kbOd 6xfhCoyKzmSacNRfheZM2GbFZ3fKyA5miFuzH8MomeJQ40BvyEvj9XfhMHwKoKww2FxA tfZA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.171.8 with SMTP id f8mr24024187qcz.13.1391969885138; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 10:18:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.27.133 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 10:18:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87wqh5sokz.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk> References: <87wqh5sokz.fsf@alrua-x1.kau.toke.dk> Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 10:18:05 -0800 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toke_H=F8iland=2DJ=F8rgensen?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] Internet in Sweden is pretty good... X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:18:06 -0000 That's quite lovely results! Was ECN enabled? On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Toke H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen w= rote: > So I got a new flat in Sweden with ethernet-to-the-wall 100/100 Mbps > internet (for ~$50/month. The municipality owns the infrastructure and > providers offer service; I had 9 different providers to pick from). Did > some measurements with my laptop plugged in to it. Maybe the municipality and/or one of those 9 competing providers might be interested in the techniques and results? > One plot is just plugging in the laptop without fiddling with > any settings (other than having fq_codel as the system-wide default > qdisc): > > http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/data/karlstad/rrul-2014-02-08T010909.617= 794.Laptop_plugged_into_apt_wall.png > > The second one is after putting in an HTB shaper: > > http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/data/karlstad/rrul-2014-02-08T142522.645= 782.Laptop_htb_105_110Mbps.png > > And a CDF for comparison: > http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/data/karlstad/cdf_comparison.png > > All the data is available at > http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/data/karlstad/ including the HTB script > that set things up. > > In conclusion: Weeeeh! :D > > Now to find a router that can handle HTB at those speeds... Or to get something written faster than HTB. But yea, the current generation of home routers is out of steam. > > -Toke > > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat > --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html