From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com (mail-iy0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B1592008F3 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 04:20:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iyi12 with SMTP id 12so10897208iyi.16 for ; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 05:06:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=K7xEpiqwZGtciNZYdezt49EZcZ9iwadixzNekHFwNjM=; b=TnUeCO9Tj3RwkOXOngHQRYYLiSYmTWzM5gZKnHdGNvhFj+q8TnAlGv0adQUONIjFah IlmGNHcu6EBnxiBcufyS8ZjCnpppBAIXbJyANclDPy8eODQ5DhfJt3z8SOfMyvmY/Ig7 iJ1ouIQeld4078OSQp8sPSnlexsPAFR7vJ1t0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.29.198 with SMTP id s6mr2840860icc.296.1312200403229; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 05:06:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.229.4 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 05:06:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 06:06:43 -0600 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: bloat Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303ea1d4e89b8d04a9707616 Subject: [Bloat] bufferbloat bug 216 could use some eyeballs badly X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:20:53 -0000 --20cf303ea1d4e89b8d04a9707616 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If anyone can spare some eyeballs for the discussion of wireless-n AMPDUs and their interaction with bufferbloat, and groks TCP's behavior and/or wireless's behavior, I'd appreciate some comment on: http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/216 Losing SOME appropriate packets, somewhere in the wireless stack, is necessary. --=20 Dave T=E4ht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 http://the-edge.blogspot.com --20cf303ea1d4e89b8d04a9707616 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If anyone can spare some eyeballs for the discussion of wireless-n AMPDUs a= nd their interaction with bufferbloat, and groks TCP's behavior and/or = wireless's behavior, I'd appreciate some comment on:

http://www.bufferbloat.net/issue= s/216

Losing SOME appropriate packets, somewhere in the wireless stack, is ne= cessary.

--
Dave T=E4ht
SKYPE: davetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-= 5608
http://t= he-edge.blogspot.com
--20cf303ea1d4e89b8d04a9707616--