From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-x232.google.com (mail-yw0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B4943B2A3 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:15:37 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-yw0-x232.google.com with SMTP id u68so18955951ywg.0 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:15:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fBROvvvjJts3P8gQ+MBlJ9hny6xItgdvGoEuR9hQ7+0=; b=fyUVmsNk7aFFUTeGBLkmpVL2gQ9WGRaHZ0U3bRU1604iZZ9l20g7PtcJLM+r2e8icB jBkvguIKc2Z6OtT6927T9jcQdW/qB9mcR8K8Wrn2ettI88ARZ6PfrE12q5Ts+r4K4lry 2PXdBFB0O87JhzbnIWJuRUwhOjFoarKx3NV4ML6H9EED3ZXI7UZ4V6dDD2vm0LOa4jNc UYbVxuad9GL1DcsrzZRT5lF/eBerBu4PgTAauFad44Lt1ZHbmmxEQfC7WAu7YiQu4kxq 2XI90W2HCtfYGMkNovY6ndNEqBjC5qoQ2sMIOIUeccnfGi2e9Mh1S7ZuFysdTrTOcU6R NtYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fBROvvvjJts3P8gQ+MBlJ9hny6xItgdvGoEuR9hQ7+0=; b=BiSfaFH41CKCcWIImDxvpiPxRfnwZS7ngd/e63XPJzT+ITVkdHe0fdYRbZFUWigw8C SFT2A8c64BBY4KTS+w93po9o2P7Jb943jrCIsmT8Cber2UJyTTsA9DBY+kOvWp0Ubapm KNUsyYEUo4FNpRfAIe8ZLWgum4wdDNugeb+B63xxyRgiDKjyFQMh8kz4DqC/p63ztfjY zJ3pqgQ82cPmkxh4/TWL8mgASRNTgv46au2T5/T8fb49FFy58qMqeGzUYlkbBSW8ehrl UP2jC6AhscsYonSkZN+nHhUdJZFth+EyJlbNQnJCcgOKWfRQctLzI2dB6usML3/OAfzs tqZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKydF6ob1z4e3/eGwNXShqfRF3I+S7wlF3Pi8NL1pxt4SLdal80dRCLTdKGJqd55n+X00lJwSvs5ekg6g== X-Received: by 10.55.89.196 with SMTP id n187mr8885771qkb.17.1485533736365; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:15:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.142.132 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:15:35 -0800 (PST) From: Dave Taht Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:15:35 -0800 Message-ID: To: bloat Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Bloat] Steam's TCP analysis X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 16:15:37 -0000 All over the net I hear of the bloated horrors steam and windows 10 updates are inflicting on people, and several saying that inbound shaping isn't helping. I finally got two captures of a steam download here: https://github.com/tohojo/sqm-scripts/issues/43#issuecomment-275281826 And aside from some potential oddities (window, timestamp) didn't see anything terribly odd in the first trace I got there. Could someone take a look with smarter eyeballs than I have? --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! http://blog.cerowrt.org