Re: [Bloat] Bloat goes away, but with ~25% speed loss?

[Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
<kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> wrote:
>
>
> On 04/06/15 21:01, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
> A useful exercise might be to log the idle latency over a long period of
> time, and correlate it to peak load periods, as A&A do.
> http://aa.net.uk/kb-broadband-cqm.html .
>
> Minor claim to 'infamy'.  The line graph shown on that page is my ADSL line
> from 4ish years ago :-)  I was having a hell of a time trying to convince BT
> to solve the packet loss issue caused by a faulty PSU in a satellite
> receiver (one whole street away and affecting a LOT of people)  Andrews &
> Arnold (ISP) were the only people capable of hitting BT with a sufficiently
> large cluebat.

A&A struck me as an extremely clueful ISP (I think they have had ipv6
/48s for forever?)
and it has been my impression that folk like that were using things
like HFSC + SFQ already
in their "rate limiters", and had experimented also with fq_codel by now.

> - Jonathan Morton
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>



-- 
Dave Täht
What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone?
https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast