From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk1-x736.google.com (mail-qk1-x736.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::736]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 163503BA8E for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 16:01:03 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qk1-x736.google.com with SMTP id d19so15497462qkg.5 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 13:01:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MQiTo6P1Odq4DNAtZb8IWsPexk+qFEhhv/z9qaqV8K0=; b=ZPWhXbalFJnBtuxnBY1/ocJWAarGaZGhzpZEKiSeH3OcbxjNOyV0zdRaF8QtCtBY8K hnAmQrc3l/THOFT1on8h2UYbrgCq9eRVIH7utNkCS7Xm03Sk8K4DFZ/h8U7fx52LG5cV UHYJMOvf8kjYhhZy6bXaxV7oRp8lbdd1dYjFubnVIZO4uTri9CO5vScYCs4OjXC8mIzX WVqa0uT7SjmRHs0bbo3+WrURo/pnpu+h2xjRoZU5Cs3zV3WWzObJiqXXj5ZHRwU8c3Nj xi7kBViaorGzB4bU+ZhDGVxeMz3WswocnLeLA9fnHFjjo1E/uigC0Fbc4Q+r09kJCdma 4RmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MQiTo6P1Odq4DNAtZb8IWsPexk+qFEhhv/z9qaqV8K0=; b=n7RxI+Dzhfq5N0GE40D6S/1RF29xwRRBX4xeJ3pdui9U8kocn0dnqmyXMe6eHey8t5 JNca6mObDjLILWmqnE17O1v81gSmnpS+8Ztqm947GogSfMqTKYlv7VbMcTWOqEfel8Wm XJ7iC5M80Mef3yRkKJBtccgeJarez58pZkotxPE3acm9bg0a27cffqPtSY5/mkvq6ny6 3mw6QO5jhm/mQYYrt8sx7E9Ni9dr1AjVy7M50LmqhJq/J7UUmqPdjIV/gf6DjFGakiyl XPf5vOWEFb8b1lf1vqKn3vFqfzT145QIbqbny24dWWplVXKeHPIyrugkT4bo8qCl8LDd Y79g== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbI8lwk+hY2zScvOfYnMPWazdZKRgeC3zu0qWCIYfC/SlHsqiQy ARpZ61vjsuath56ptdKBYGdPBaL7jtaXwPYi6OE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XFeVL2dgbG/iQdEYY+dFhIZfRtyGflbQ+7WXWK901fDoayVT0263s4faO5EX5CeRSl7VwKCxeMEv1XV/+87h0= X-Received: by 2002:a37:9ce:: with SMTP id 197mr30522609qkj.164.1543352462511; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 13:01:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <65EAC6C1-4688-46B6-A575-A6C7F2C066C5@heistp.net> <874lc2w89s.fsf@toke.dk> In-Reply-To: <874lc2w89s.fsf@toke.dk> From: Dave Taht Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 13:00:50 -0800 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Cc: Neal Cardwell , bloat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Bloat] when does the CoDel part of fq_codel help in the real world? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 21:01:03 -0000 On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 12:54 PM Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > > Dave Taht writes: > > > I've done things like measure induced latency on wireguard streams of > > late and codel keeps it sane. still, wireguard internally is optimized > > for single flow "dragster" performance, and I'd like it to gain the > > same fq_codel optimization that did such nice things for multiple > > flows terminating on the router for ipsec. The before/after on that > > was marvelous. > > This is on my list, FWIW :) Your queue overfloweth. And as good as you are at FQ-ing yourself, I so dearly would like the !@#!@#@! wifi patches to land in 4.20. > -Toke --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-205-9740