From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x236.google.com (mail-ob0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0BE021F33F for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 14:40:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obbgh1 with SMTP id gh1so150815254obb.1 for ; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:40:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1bg3uWNR2M5+YrvJiVKiWFQIYi8hHOQkcsfpIo7HZOw=; b=FnNcc9aNJdeaBzrL+TeCsxjlcGUAuk/B38gfwI53D0Fb0OkUkm7H/w+spgkCZsEbB2 0ZIhtve0q0DvcDY/kmn2B1IRmBrlh1xbX53B5FxJrjeGnOlBFYJGaSv/pZCTas2FDF2f rZ/Bt6ZC/7SGBkF4YbGahlleqT4JIKcCPYDb43dMZwpTl2YK0IwAIlGdOCV++aTGsO4k zpqfjs+2TkHVWgc8GU0NQzRKdeRMrGX96LgTuHEWBWRlZckxq+oxW9yAQCJGeLms01YG kKBG82IBoz5bZ1K0JnvfKHAeoy9wg8Dkjrq5u8qUJ0DNPV8L69N5MWaXpYmJNWOwvNmg b4aw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.103.234 with SMTP id fz10mr34483840oeb.11.1428529220900; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:40:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.51.66 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 14:40:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20150408211249.GA15526@sesse.net> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 14:40:20 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: "Steinar H. Gunderson" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] Suggestions/advice for captive portal on gw00/gw10? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 21:40:50 -0000 On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Steinar H. Gunderson > wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 01:02:57PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: >>> I am also bugged by the total insecurity built into WPA that has also >>> led to this decline in ambient connectivity over the last 10 years. >>> Anyone can capture a key exchange, or force one, to gain full access >>> to that nodes wifi traffic >> >> Wait, what? Citation needed. I retract this portion of my rant. Having a bad day, sorry. >>> [2] Take an aircap, then take it apart via wireshark: >>> https://wiki.wireshark.org/HowToDecrypt802.11 >> >> For this, you need to know the PSK (or, equivalently, the PMK). > > Yes, anyone with access to the shared crypted network with a PSK can > decode everybody elses traffic. > >> /* Steinar */ >> -- >> Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Bloat mailing list >> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat > > > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht > We CAN make better hardware, ourselves, beat bufferbloat, and take > back control of the edge of the internet! If we work together, on > making it: > > https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/onetswitch/onetswitch-open-source-ha= rdware-for-networking --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht We CAN make better hardware, ourselves, beat bufferbloat, and take back control of the edge of the internet! If we work together, on making it: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/onetswitch/onetswitch-open-source-hard= ware-for-networking