From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qt1-x834.google.com (mail-qt1-x834.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::834])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C7E13BA8E
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri,  4 Jan 2019 12:11:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x834.google.com with SMTP id k12so41060936qtf.7
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 09:11:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=MfF2twAilce1E1KI2oENKSrytkOKcMOwJf62keaILfo=;
 b=FTdDXpBtXYlr+vNhVrURRu2nH7Npi/MKCwQqLvszk6+ZOsbTjTi9vzNBcZWHYbEmf2
 wTuhS69xvNeJWvoyLCCw+egE3t6s5dcWn2YxWLshI7lLm9o8KA9EnL7k1YX9TjnHrswP
 ZF2XhJhDpI2D70iYkQn3iqs6CjO7TGf+A4JrG9rfUKBCU7iKvcVNaPI1wdqjr2PeX6Xq
 KUtVhsGzrX3T9kLOcKTnF1r41wd69GkStDyKCLZv3LysabLKCPVhpXR/3eEOB1/1qe5B
 7rs/XzGtpoUq8K/vLIPpu7nGWDXxa919bevwNM4ltajaoaKJTFw5zA3tjxYch6SVIGoi
 veAg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=MfF2twAilce1E1KI2oENKSrytkOKcMOwJf62keaILfo=;
 b=amwpqsG3ftoHBCJXtK6C5rBbSQGqM2oqysdjDJA2NOOtp3Z6/AABr4dVU+airw7RUN
 V0XFE+kodbPx2+txOZM0gTyHolYUy2sBUZhSOfDSQ/sBOIcRW5CKjYfqKRL0tNLOCmbX
 +IVF9k53RkWUUemekv1pfYbWuhB8waDPwK8rkyKtW8fIxB7VZozOamkVy3Lgo7r0GHL3
 yS/8asGahCXu8omn+XniKzGaJhhrSpigja0sUY9HoVbuCQ3vlJz7hJdZFEVrG/CTXnOH
 VM0R7zhtQyWY5H84ZTIbq25YvyVwMrjTbshCTmIkRwzhAgJn1DaYLxKQJt+dT+JUZIq0
 YPqw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdTZxNe/4wDaW/6BBoOs+8G0+ljc1CWYoJH78RUCcOTFe85Kioz
 jmTQx9EEd3LvUn+pQhvz8+oH77j9ZtaGCfEVWIbA5w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XRI4brmorXt7cgrAMcwP65hL+ngWM0mJYaRDBihb9bt+tXErjKRnNv4ggd3cUdTnf8SyzICp8pmplZG7x2Ggo=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:3065:: with SMTP id g34mr52093872qte.136.1546621859766; 
 Fri, 04 Jan 2019 09:10:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABQZMoLhpvaFcDbZeWgpmjzPRCYCMrOtjAzM_Q7+9W6_N8h6cA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABQZMoLhpvaFcDbZeWgpmjzPRCYCMrOtjAzM_Q7+9W6_N8h6cA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 09:10:47 -0800
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6Sct=zuRHo2KdRqFhvMO-EYyKwrpxziSkd45w0TdxN7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: cloneman <bufferbloat@flamingpc.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Does VDSL interleaving+FEC help bufferbloat?
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:11:00 -0000

dsl interleave was added primarily to make multicast udp tv streams
work better (as they are very intolerant of packet loss). Often (as in
free's implementation) these streams are "invisible" to the overlying
IP applications. It typically adds at least 6ms of delay to an already
slow technology.

Do measure unloaded latency with and without it on, it's been a long
time since I fiddled with it....