All those protocols are too &#39;ANT&#39;-like - nearly at the level of statistical noise. Need a much bigger hammer than that to play with. <br><br>That said, there&#39;s plenty of problems showing up in the noise...<br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Dave Hart <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:davehart@gmail.com">davehart@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 15:39, Dave Taht &lt;<a href="mailto:dave.taht@gmail.com">dave.taht@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; And suggestions on other multicast/broadcast tools generating data worth<br>
&gt; analyzing is highly desired.<br>
<br>
</div>I don&#39;t know if they qualify as &quot;worth analyzing&quot;, but how about<br>
IPv6&#39;s substantial use of multicast, for ND, RA, and likely DHCP6?<br>
Also, NTP broadcast/multicast and manycast (which uses multicast to<br>
find servers, then unicast client/server for ongoing operation).<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<font color="#888888">Dave Hart<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Dave Täht<br>SKYPE: davetaht<br>US Tel: 1-239-829-5608<br><a href="http://the-edge.blogspot.com" target="_blank">http://the-edge.blogspot.com</a> <br>