From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x231.google.com (mail-qt0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFECC3B2A0 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:53:55 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qt0-x231.google.com with SMTP id w33so210450762qtc.3 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:53:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kvnGrbOvvvmMT1vgSza6e8lYuECMRqRG8Au7eeyTO7U=; b=wVT1EUqSo6PMGsQFAowBuZesy+hix3TJBaOa0vrBExapXupCPrsuJ8cuSVfkC2uYol U7chL+/3u6m0F0sQa4xKPTLE19/8xtL9RKqi1gQxB8lMYBJvBLZOuvtd1iLM5daBlues AzLeORxkTsozuGV/pfeO9Ntc5c1ERd6WWnVMbdWupik1dtoZOoFLE0GT94566aKkS0/Q MyZ1TddeCeYeTKrbRorVOwSInHgH/ar+gg4u0IVRfqN1WN9N2bMFVtfuGXq+ths/GO1K HboIhcbBuQp9ZFy6hRDLAbvLLLDX4/wsoy+WeXZiWfDJxETQ9XClJSnnX4jcg3dnSOpJ PLJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kvnGrbOvvvmMT1vgSza6e8lYuECMRqRG8Au7eeyTO7U=; b=P3QaEfFNSiycRVY5eyoR4LV10a2ZpGUhHoB2ZY4pTgk4Vk4sC3zt2NxvRsiSy5SRR5 TqLnErwT3wZJ5uQB84828VDzPYHvZYCMTDAF/8MUQXprVBfVRNE0/0AebemSDPHz2Q4i egYUJDsyZtLxB+uweUoUauaswO4pu/ErECZ0y2cy8X6Eqe4Q54l8b62zgk/bxHx6uFiB A34lg2rf2vN4KymWgN71y9SeNdGejQmZaUgNd09ohTh7PVxWjGI9jLLxB53qugMFpNEB 2m44slxnhemSPdWQqNEARBUXrZzN9fwQE5lFnlUQLcUEgdydbDSS/EppngD4jrdsZLeh GNNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02fGIttuSjBaEB+vmrKCqUp1QrTJE2mhDSvb2pupyzLntDMwwmHTf6deFSajj4nM8rdvgioUaTdr6ge+w== X-Received: by 10.200.36.148 with SMTP id s20mr8789022qts.275.1479754435405; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:53:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.137.198 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:53:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <23E6ACF4-C106-4164-9E28-831DDAE8ADE7@gmail.com> References: <23E6ACF4-C106-4164-9E28-831DDAE8ADE7@gmail.com> From: Dave Taht Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:53:55 -0800 Message-ID: To: Rich Brown Cc: bloat Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Bloat] "Best Practices for Benchmarking" article still up to date? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 18:53:55 -0000 It's getting long in the tooth, yes. The early advice to use HZ1000 more or less still applies to BSD, but linux long ago gained nohz capability. I tend to build things with HZ250 still - but I don't even know what openwrt uses, and we leverage hirez timers now on most platforms anyway. On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:13 AM, Rich Brown wrote= : > The "Best Practices for Benchmarking" article (https://www.bufferbloat.ne= t/projects/codel/wiki/Best_practices_for_benchmarking_Codel_and_FQ_Codel/) = came up in a forum (https://forum.lede-project.org/t/build-for-netgear-r780= 0/316/9) > > Is this still good advice? Thanks. > > Rich > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! http://blog.cerowrt.org