Re: [Bloat] UniFi Dream Machine Pro

[Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 7:55 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This review, highly recommending this router on the high end
>
> https://www.increasebroadbandspeed.co.uk/best-router-2020
>
> also states that the sqm implementation has been dumbed down
> significantly and can only shape 800Mbit inbound. Long ago we did a
> backport of cake to the other ubnt routers mentioned in the review,
> has anyone tackled this one?

I take it the answer to this question is... no?

For the record I helped do the original fq_codel port to the
edgerouter over a weekend back in 2013. the ubnt
community jumped all over it, polished up the configuration language
to use it, leveraged the sqm
spec and demanded the result in their next formal release... which
ubnt did. It's been an ever
increasing "selling feature" for them ever since.

There were like 800 messages on that wonderful 2013 thread, can't find it now.

I don't know how closed this hw is, compared to the older edgerouters.
I can go hit the ubnt
forums to find out. Back then the devkit was freely available.

I wouldn't mind getting in there to finally fix frame compensation or
integrate cake.


>
>
> --
> "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
> relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman
>
> dave@taht.net <Dave Täht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729



-- 
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman

dave@taht.net <Dave Täht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729