From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ww0-f47.google.com (mail-ww0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3293F20035E for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:01:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so4424640wgb.28 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:01:12 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of dave.taht@gmail.com designates 10.180.100.33 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.100.33; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of dave.taht@gmail.com designates 10.180.100.33 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=dave.taht@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=dave.taht@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.100.33]) by 10.180.100.33 with SMTP id ev1mr27926965wib.3.1329796872896 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:01:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VXq+x4toPuBjmwmWGzsyGp8sbYJC3raU/wSz6G4w7dc=; b=O7URg3ySwNxefNEcPoNNzw0ok/BvK1QbNJcm/LkSsDcnzbL70FkMGPQb2dgCu7xW2F xh/Z0JAEzeH09UtTvWatqip6tbFn4Bq834Z1ZjChe5b83Dx+SFgz8eylm+G1/H1ToEcf Ubm4wVHDqDHjK2CCbsDWzoMftW6xD/wOAwXNE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.100.33 with SMTP id ev1mr23308632wib.3.1329796872774; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:01:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.117.1 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:01:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F426146.3010200@rogers.com> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:01:12 +0000 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Jim Reisert AD1C Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444026639a5ca04b971765b Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net, davecb@spamcop.net Subject: Re: [Bloat] How soon can the brave but foolish start being early adopters X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:01:15 -0000 --f46d0444026639a5ca04b971765b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:05 AM, David Collier-Brown wrote: > > > I'm an interested lurker (and capacity planner) who might easily try > > out the work that's been done in CeroWrt if it would be useful to you. > > Consider me a prospective exposure tester (:-)) > > Dave, I went through this exercise some months back. The problem we > ran into was that the wired and wireless subnets broke Windows file > sharing. We got most of the way there, but due to family harmony, I > had to abandon the testing I was doing before I could test a full > solution. Search for my posts in the archives and you'll see where > the problem may have been resolved. > > But I won't try this again until the next CeroWRT release. I backed > off to Open WRT for the time being, which doesn't have the issue. > I'd like to think the samba + routing issue is resolved - the new samba 3.6.3 package has been highly tuned and optimized by several core members of the openwrt team, and I'm now including it by default in the current cerowrt 3.3 builds. But, I'd like to actually be testing Jim's scenario before I say it's fixed, and that awaits a rebuild of bloatlab 1. Many other things are in flux, but settling down rapidly. I hope to have gathered the final requirements for the next release by the end of next week, and to start producing truly usable-as-your-default-router builds... as soon as I start getting those builds into the new, improved and updated bloatlab #1... and a couple other things land... which I hope would be in about a month. In the meantime I note that more cerowrt news and traffic can be had on the cerowrt-devel list, and needent be on 'bloat'. We're also trying to get better about putting out news on the site, as well. > > -- > Jim Reisert AD1C, , http://www.ad1c.us > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat > --=20 Dave T=E4ht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 http://www.bufferbloat.net --f46d0444026639a5ca04b971765b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Jim Re= isert AD1C <= jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:05 AM, David Collier-Brown wrot= e:

> =A0I'm an interested lurker (and capacity planner) =A0who might ea= sily try
> out the work that's been done in CeroWrt if it would be useful to = you.
> Consider me a prospective exposure tester (:-))

Dave, I went through this exercise some months back. =A0The problem w= e
ran into was that the wired and wireless subnets broke Windows file
sharing. =A0We got most of the way there, but due to family harmony, I
had to abandon the testing I was doing before I could test a full
solution. =A0Search for my posts in the archives and you'll see where the problem may have been resolved.

But I won't try this again until the next CeroWRT release. =A0I backed<= br> off to Open WRT for the time being, which doesn't have the issue.

I'd like to think the samba + routing issue is reso= lved - the new samba 3.6.3 package has been highly tuned and optimized by s= everal core members of the openwrt team, and I'm now including it by de= fault in the current cerowrt 3.3 builds.

But, I'd like to actually be testing Jim's scenario before I sa= y it's fixed, and that awaits a rebuild of bloatlab 1.

Many othe= r things are in flux, but settling down rapidly.

I hope to have gath= ered the final requirements for the next
release by the end of next week, and to start producing
truly usable-as-= your-default-router builds...

as soon as I start getting those build= s into the new, improved
and updated bloatlab #1... and a couple other t= hings land...

which I hope would be in about a month.

In the meantime I note t= hat more cerowrt news and traffic can be had on the cerowrt-devel list, and= needent be on 'bloat'. We're also trying to get better about p= utting out news on the site, as well.
=A0

--
Jim Reisert AD1C, <jjreisert@a= lum.mit.edu>, http:= //www.ad1c.us
_____________________= __________________________
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net<= /a>
= https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat



--
Dave T=E4ht=
SKYPE: davetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
http://www.bufferbloat.net
--f46d0444026639a5ca04b971765b--