oops, correction: On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > > > This is just plain wrong. In wireless-g the relationship between these > queues is far more sane than in -n. Aggregation doesn't currently happen in > the VO(?) queue - thus in addition to having a larger transmit window, the > (CORRECTION!) VI queue can aggregate up to 64 packets. > > ^^^^ (vo and vi are very different, in other words) -- Dave Täht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 FR Tel: 0638645374 http://www.bufferbloat.net