From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x22d.google.com (mail-qt0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 650143B2A4 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 19:18:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qt0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id w26-v6so12054885qto.5 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:18:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ye6zTzq8C69NZdcxLL8s5IuO/PQAATnI3kB64YpZUaM=; b=kyr1NjJbKL/S0BwqIF1PLccBnBSp/OIYbQfcT+82mQkWwdEOohtQPbBAkyLP25l9yC So+s1XVp4r51Og0/OTRVJ0ykWjpe7ION94yfQYHzQHvK6rtFwpfvDMYM2gLsuJzDhk/W QyvZ2IBtunRwOqNYq+u3zX+/YfK4ovJNK5UxmWRZS/ptfAOJjT1CDYw2VrPp77mxxJqj AEKIXZmi+ebrLZOYAmNPehOvyi/8RaWJLlC7GxN4c5JO9a2/XyLy4WIBzphHCERlF5CR n82BYQwm+gowqbQKN7rnU8EqHn1Vnyd7DNobozzi6bu1AVjAP43AeqnVRFNLXxvJTVGJ KJeQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ye6zTzq8C69NZdcxLL8s5IuO/PQAATnI3kB64YpZUaM=; b=ffhyIOdMgc+rXQMg73TMemeoBPsXcL+MM/dsi+16MmeHp7q9X5+AtyK4uuMBIXD/2c obwP9quKJchWLYm3ocMYkMLpEYyEK+jt41eNSVIH7VdN5TTVoNFIm5vB0oM4bAclx+Xr iYwTGRTI5j+kzsHnXPEs0Kzp0YydoaPedMIFfZxZC1mkj9P0zpER6UxJYsIM2XwYNeEe Fe+jkeWMuy2r0RuyFU3mlbucHXlOp6dk3Gb8HFZsZRTbOZvbSUwZfWBcQxiNBa5wTnae 4d+kpB0t48Zu7Mhf7FY4dY1kmL6eb+ql32r6Cg3U1K9fYiD/uA13EusKKniyOZoiB7Ar 9MgA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlFXs8XziMCE4M+/DfFaRd7VfUvkTqA4Qgh2VQm9HVDJYh05Heys c3V4Zx3Q99DaLv19pXrm25bZbnT5sJs7+3nu21o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPxGMSD+ld2QIDK/8ns8BcrO9GP+5qcUhgccB5J0N/QF21Ra/iWvnlEsTK0JoFW5nSynfecIyS9ZCKYqGW8ysiA= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:9e5a:: with SMTP id z26-v6mr7626432qve.15.1533943083960; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:18:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Dave Taht Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:18:34 -0700 Message-ID: To: rosenp@gmail.com Cc: bloat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Bloat] Flow offload's impact on bufferbloat X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 23:18:04 -0000 what device? what sort of bql stats do you see? In both of these cases you should just enable sqm set to 100/5 and it shouldn't matter. On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 4:12 PM Rosen Penev wrote: > > OpenWrt has backported Netfilter's flow offload functionality from > kernel 4.17 to 4.14. I've been noticing higher speeds as well as > higher latency with it enabled. Anyone have any insight? My test > results are here: > > On: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/37007587 > Off: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/37007494 > > Note the latencies. > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-669-226-2619