From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x232.google.com (mail-ob0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB11121F415 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 07:42:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id uy5so1846908obc.9 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 07:42:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=i81rAiMqMRymTFgUfJ9zBtm6soNTXmmeI8m2n9ruN5k=; b=Zcy8HhL3ND8v5TIx0l+pr0AsPkF7rIjcXRKWzTcIejaiSmb4revXbA4kLp95w/hBiJ Zy8iUX16OjkyY9XUfwo7XySVazXrrMp5gMFtU8GaROzAlyOhtRVTFp/Fxq0joTfWqLj0 Uc9cKmfLmlCl3koeBsWAC4tKq2WVQ66i3TyQKQJan3G/c0834iWno6TVk5QbEs32AI5x 79JQzM11TGZTt4AptTuW/bvoLbwIajp94dWEqO3SH/Kefj7p4hdjA8gfjPuRWwKbfvA/ XP3Vh/LjCt5K5uIv91xSy/i2k4auQkLK4HcAxWq1d0xwiBJHKSv2ON9YJGc/o080OVeH Bsvw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.65.135 with SMTP id x7mr10816031oes.45.1409323346752; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 07:42:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.227.76 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 07:42:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <000301cfc37d$0002b720$00082560$@duckware.com> References: <000001cfbefe$69194c70$3b4be550$@duckware.com> <000901cfc2c2$c21ae460$4650ad20$@duckware.com> <4A89264B-36C5-4D1F-9E5E-33F2B42C364E@gmail.com> <002201cfc2e4$565c1100$03143300$@duckware.com> <000301cfc37d$0002b720$00082560$@duckware.com> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 07:42:26 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Jerry Jongerius Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] The Dark Problem with AQM in the Internet? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 14:42:28 -0000 On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Jerry Jongerius wrot= e: >> Okay that is interesting, Could I convince you to try to enable SACK >> on the server and test whether you still see the catastrophic results? >> And/or try another tcp variant instead of westwood+, like the default > cubic. > > Would love to, but can not. I have read only access to settings on that > server. I have servers setup across the planet at the planet (linode and google cloud services) at this point that I can setup with any tcp/sack/timestamp combination desired. Give me a location you want to repeat your tests. (west coast us, colorado, east coast, japan, england are the ones I can easily muck with) > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_= indecent.article