Re: [Bloat] Credit and/or collaboration on a responsiveness metric?

[Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>]

I would gladly work with you on refining the metric. ENOFUNDING but I
have enough in the bank to last a while.

But yes, it would also be nice to attract a student or two.

On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 4:21 PM Matt Mathis via Bloat
<bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
> The rounds based responsiveness metric is awesome!   There are several slightly different versions, with slightly different properties....
>
> I would like to write a little paper (probably for the IAB workshop), but don't want to short change anybody else's credit, or worse, scoop somebody else's work in progress.   I don't really know if I am retracing somebody else's steps, or on a parallel but different path (more likely).   I would be really sad to publish something and then find out later that I trashed some PhD students' thesis....
>
> Please let me know if you know of anybody else working in this space, of any publications that might be in progress or if people might be interested in another collaborator.
>
> Thanks,
> --MM--
> The best way to predict the future is to create it.  - Alan Kay
>
> We must not tolerate intolerance;
>        however our response must be carefully measured:
>             too strong would be hypocritical and risks spiraling out of control;
>             too weak risks being mistaken for tacit approval.
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat



-- 
Latest Podcast:
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6791014284936785920/

Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC