From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4C273B29D for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:35:20 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id e2so1364686iog.0 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 21:35:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wIf3gJF3p5H8uIk3cOtN7CSFR16avW7lUXNFwdBBrVo=; b=YxOiz5JTEpCDMUyro67HvP6bBPSl+U8URDp6lhye6Jip4blgHVrxrQMz52ZphKhDtc +DOyoOv16ScUxh80SXMOVB9OEe2QBMXtpIOQZqvNjM7Fsr7acUN8kEteB2DtfJ1GhfpL 16uBKWnGKsMGbJlR6EyEO04vGuEstLX41coXDT4wRwZca5ZiDYa4jHFWMNwJICP0HS2q 8MJxJZKsuIEyCBb4F8TZwsI4ufkXpv6eTlswUCTNdZykJCrzehNrFQGb9DdUnxtXyxKW 8hbJ/sVlrXi+FGxKPhSV6h14RUl6rxgik1yhKE/mnh4lSdepbNKU9HkLmXik8qcLvqE8 /OfQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wIf3gJF3p5H8uIk3cOtN7CSFR16avW7lUXNFwdBBrVo=; b=FBRWUUrOHeodXu1mP8c9R6vbydUXpt40EXOJgRBv1Ae6x7xkDaBj0ddvKw6GJXSkAl P9AQoeAyIhRIDPBsogEJ+CbkuAZMUpcbdcYY1UWQistSM86BMtXko7Y89ncR6F7Rlo13 jqrpgJ/KUorKoRT9BZ4mC0rtNbNLoulS8+y5S1UducHnZeT3/DbAK/OljC90JZDkgErw RIoHDKXBMjSrnMCscVBVXzTvC+LKbeVI6NnMjffoGyICga9eH/B4Zrw/XB5TYcLCmS9m 5nAiw3XjAjVZGLX3MBJe5+cgAHzAERhf2TwzewwRH4RNY07mv/Cmcqyn27Pw5hMBifAy HsYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531A5sND8beiJFdQhOFK1F+NbSG5cEFbs2NfaE3RxzN0iGcoTiHV wuV3NapdBT4GTyeWruBwFMgY1fvmOWjbFiEOM4ehZhpQNQc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy3DK8ALmQRFq8HkmNHvNm5iC0OiMlE08HUZBoLxjyLNykNZ0iyVSP3Ovk01JjjGVPAYIFy1GdQUvIau0TmO78= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:20d5:: with SMTP id 21mr1363099ioz.100.1614231320102; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 21:35:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1D68EF40C3A8A269831408C8@[172.27.17.193]> In-Reply-To: From: Dave Taht Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 21:35:07 -0800 Message-ID: To: Kenneth Porter Cc: bloat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Bloat] Updated Bufferbloat Test X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 05:35:20 -0000 and with the sqmscripts off? On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:29 PM Kenneth Porter wrot= e: > > On 2/24/2021 2:15 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: > > > > I'll try to remember to run this from my office tonight when nobody's > > around. We've got a 50 Mbps fiber connection with AT&T and I'm using > > fq_codel on a CentOS 7 system for the SQM. That should be interesting. > > https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=3D494dbe95-5302-4e1c-8= 4cd-fbb4c8871ea2 > > This is after restarting the sqm-scripts. I got initial bad results and > looked at the debug log and found that the iptables commands were > failing to get a lock during system boot to set up the mangle table. I > think it's competing with firewalld and fail2ban and losing. I don't see > any lock errors from the restart and now the test shows good bloat result= s. > > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat --=20 "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman dave@taht.net CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729