General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bloat] Possibly FreeBSD's Codel is misconfigued
@ 2015-06-19  0:03 Benjamin Cronce
  2015-06-19  0:13 ` Dave Taht
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Cronce @ 2015-06-19  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bloat

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 410 bytes --]

https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=88162.msg519194#msg519194

The source code looks like it is set for a target of 100 and an interval of
5. I use PFSense and CoDel is working great for me right now. Pretty much
0ms of bufferbloat on the DSLReports tests. If it actually is
misconfigured, it's working great for me.

codel_alloc(int target, int interval, int ecn)
cl->cl_codel = codel_alloc(100, 5, 0);

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 591 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bloat] Possibly FreeBSD's Codel is misconfigued
  2015-06-19  0:03 [Bloat] Possibly FreeBSD's Codel is misconfigued Benjamin Cronce
@ 2015-06-19  0:13 ` Dave Taht
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2015-06-19  0:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Cronce; +Cc: bloat

Sigh. No matter how hard we tried for something almost impossible to
configure wrong, it happens.

1) A target needs to be bigger than the time it takes for a single
full size MTU. E.g. at 1mbit, target should be about 13ms on 1500 byte
mtu.


on that thread:
is this wrong?

altq on em0 codelq( qlimit 5, interval 105 ) bandwidth 630Kb queue { root_em0 }
Edit: To clarify, qlimit = target.

2) There are people there complaining about ping loss in codel under
load. That's expected. (with or without an appropriate target). It
shows it's working.

3) With hfsc, however, sparser flows are prioritized, so you would
probably see less ping loss.


On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Benjamin Cronce <bcronce@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=88162.msg519194#msg519194
>
> The source code looks like it is set for a target of 100 and an interval of
> 5. I use PFSense and CoDel is working great for me right now. Pretty much
> 0ms of bufferbloat on the DSLReports tests. If it actually is misconfigured,
> it's working great for me.
>
> codel_alloc(int target, int interval, int ecn)
> cl->cl_codel = codel_alloc(100, 5, 0);
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>



-- 
Dave Täht
worldwide bufferbloat report:
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat
And:
What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone?
https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-19  0:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-06-19  0:03 [Bloat] Possibly FreeBSD's Codel is misconfigued Benjamin Cronce
2015-06-19  0:13 ` Dave Taht

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox