On Sep 25, 2013 9:58 AM, "Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 17:38 +0200, Luca MUSCARIELLO wrote:
>
> > Then, I feel like FQ is a bad name to call this "newFQ".
> > It's an implementation of a fair TCP pacer. Which is very useful, but FQ
> > is kind of misleading, IMHO.
>
> No problem, feel free to send a patch. I am very bad at choosing names.

Fair TCP pacer = ftp # taken
Paced fair queue = pfq # lit collision
Enhanced paced queue = epq # pronounced epic!
>
>