From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qt0-x236.google.com (mail-qt0-x236.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::236])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DAB33B29E
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:08:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x236.google.com with SMTP id v23so169522992qtb.0
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:08:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=5zquKaUMDIrdWZDK4X+4T8ql6Nxqg0kb+d9Hat2M1Mo=;
 b=s18NTWyNcTCdX+ykma+XGHWYonhXsE3NmfNJhrqETMet3uhR1ovxhRwCKX7G+Y+zXR
 jAKlNvqK+Y+EVOW1/n5jSF+QwStHQDwaRz0gbsR8w2jrNt3Y8HzeWZuzYv0dEWuAslW5
 KkBjxLxFw0STqqMkEkll80mKVH0SIiD5bT+R+238Xr0Kb8pxXvkZNZsQvBOo+CAHgJCi
 sVRBV5CtYmlISEQgxwRiEOC7bt0Mh4d12ACt+Ey/C2D3szSVC+nYAWu26dkSnLxW3lgL
 DGQBuZ1J8xp89e6LpvUGtK8u21i0fTVeoAIdfKsPLEK5aSdy+FO9PS1+Z5TbL5RzKfuB
 S2EQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=5zquKaUMDIrdWZDK4X+4T8ql6Nxqg0kb+d9Hat2M1Mo=;
 b=Sq6884rCWV7EOppw7Omf5z1lhc1qBIPUuIZTC8boSwit4G4kqBWUHY+CBngJ2Xk3Rs
 hJdCIE6UAZM0qbebrccnooEtCR4bnoY95l6/+2K2p1CPS50C1G7QANk1JtFZx7pDYoVa
 vamjvFjVnoBZ2jFk5URhMYsBOmfkwINemqGJGPTdAEshPBujHkNxZuwpBN4l0Hu8Oc2v
 PfB9z5JIrF32lymr8OZZsNB2EzdJEmfu2DHGhjFFUJg9DX6kJ1sF8rb2oKbymryDQFAw
 hthoSzzSrsB/tLh49fxjc8R8cSPvFnabY1hdhm/apz+OYYs13BM283BX1d8TSr8ldYYA
 LL1w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJoXS71+mRCG32CYr9t0oh/RsmtkcBRPpSx+xLBAonLWACPyVvIH+/cgJgETYiJzfsysI28IH1hhEvpCA==
X-Received: by 10.200.0.193 with SMTP id d1mr3200050qtg.275.1484064508189;
 Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:08:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.152.197 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:08:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:08:27 -0800
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7kWJhmr-Su+BptKYo7P7DUmo5vsLDswBcpZSia+KvyjA@mail.gmail.com>
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: [Bloat] The Impact of Active Queue Management on DASH-based Content
	Delivery
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 16:08:28 -0000

This was quite good. I particularly liked the invention of the
"instability index".

Jonathan Kua, Grenville Armitage and Philip Branch, "The Impact of
Active Queue Management on DASH-based Content Delivery," in 41st
Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN), Dubai, UAE, 7
- 10 November 2016,    https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN.2016.24

(more easily available via: http://sci-hub.bz/10.1109/LCN.2016.24# )

I hope a test like this gets repeated against BBR (and for that
matter, cake), and against a larger dynamic range of bandwidths (4k
video, anyone)?