General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "Jonas Mårtensson" <martensson.jonas@gmail.com>
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] 22 seconds til bloat on gfiber?
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:56:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7ret3FGXG=QxweHB+5XZiwmuzOuoyRgm6jSLpBtyGhZw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM9iV=+TkjrM5X6GnYKVRVNOv0F3OL+WbqxD6QbVG6gECC-Mqg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Jonas Mårtensson
<martensson.jonas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
>>
>>> What I mean is that the OLT optics become very expensive if you need to
>>> support as many lambdas as you have customers. You'd furthermore need an
>>> OLT port for much fewer customers (e.g. 1 port per 64 or 128 customers)
>>> than the thousands you can support on a (shared) GPON port on a single
>>> lambda.
>>
>>
>> That only works if your customers don't use their Internet access very
>> much. If they do, you're in trouble and have to rebuild.
>
>
> Yes, and the question then becomes: How much is "very much"? This can of
> course be analyzed mathematically, which e.g. Google have done here:

When you are on one side of an S curve, it's hard to see where it flattens out.

I've been meaning to research and write a piece called "have we
reached 'Peak Bandwidth'"? for a while now.

My thesis is that what users actually want is short RTTs for
interactive, once basic bandwidth needs are slaked, which starts to
happen once you crack the largest typical load (which these days is 4k
video streaming).

gbit fiber is *way* on the unneeded side of the demand curve for home users.


> http://research.google.com/pubs/pub44935.html

which kind of points out that you need business users to use it all up.

>>
>>
>> In my market, we're now in the access speeds where 100/10 is on the lower
>> end of access, and it's not uncommon for people to have 250, 500 or 1000
>> downstream. If they then actually start using their bw then you'd have to
>> rebuild to either go higher speed for some CPE (complicated and expensive),
>> or rebuild to have smaller splitter domains.

I am curious if studies exists of the actual consumption in typical
100mbit and above plans, vs 20Mbit, here and worldwide. Again, my
thesis is, aside from business (and bittorrent) users, your typical
250mbit plan would have very close to the same consumption as the
100mbit plan. They'd use up 250mbits for a couple hours a month, but
that's it.

I am increasingly convinced that without a killer application that requires it,
we've hit "peak bandwidth".

>
> The standard answer from PON proponents (I'm not one) is to upgrade
> equipment, from GPON to XG-PON or NG-PON2. But upgrading hardware as
> bandwidth demand increases is necessary whatever the technology - what's
> important is the scalability of the solution.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>



-- 
Dave Täht
Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
http://blog.cerowrt.org

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-27 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-22 21:56 Dave Taht
2016-10-22 23:52 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-10-23  1:33   ` jb
2016-10-23  1:45     ` Dave Taht
2016-10-23  1:47       ` Dave Taht
2016-10-23  2:27         ` jb
     [not found]           ` <CAJq5cE3DsV9v6ATVeq+vF_kVFjKy+8Qjwe-P01ZZbyKZB9HC6w@mail.gmail.com>
2016-10-23  8:29             ` Jonathan Morton
2016-10-23  9:23               ` jb
2016-10-23 16:14                 ` Klatsky, Carl
2016-10-24  0:46                   ` jb
2016-10-24 13:13                     ` Klatsky, Carl
2016-10-24 16:11                       ` Noah Causin
2016-10-24 20:27                         ` Klatsky, Carl
2016-10-23  2:30         ` Benjamin Cronce
2016-10-25  7:10   ` Jonas Mårtensson
2016-10-23  5:50 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2016-10-24 16:57   ` Jonas Mårtensson
2016-10-24 22:10     ` Benjamin Cronce
2016-10-25  0:09       ` jb
2016-10-25 12:01         ` Benjamin Cronce
2016-10-25 13:11         ` Klatsky, Carl
2016-10-25 21:20           ` jb
2016-10-26  0:02             ` Klatsky, Carl
2016-10-25 15:59       ` Jan Ceuleers
2016-10-26  1:05         ` Benjamin Cronce
2016-10-26 14:49           ` Jan Ceuleers
2016-10-26 15:36             ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2016-10-27 14:32               ` Jonas Mårtensson
2016-10-27 16:56                 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2016-10-27 17:56                   ` [Bloat] Sidebar on s-curves David Collier-Brown
2016-10-27 19:30                   ` [Bloat] 22 seconds til bloat on gfiber? David Lang
2016-10-27 19:41                     ` Dave Taht
2016-10-27 19:48                       ` Aaron Wood
2016-10-28 15:51                         ` Jan Ceuleers
2016-10-28 15:55                           ` Klatsky, Carl
2016-10-27 19:45                     ` Aaron Wood
2016-10-27 20:17                   ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2016-12-07  5:40                     ` Jonathan Morton
2016-12-07  7:05                       ` Mikael Abrahamsson
     [not found] <mailman.313.1477591111.3555.bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2016-10-27 19:27 ` Jonathan Foulkes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw7ret3FGXG=QxweHB+5XZiwmuzOuoyRgm6jSLpBtyGhZw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=martensson.jonas@gmail.com \
    --cc=swmike@swm.pp.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox