From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com (mail-oi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5937B21F627 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:49:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi0-f51.google.com with SMTP id g201so1309173oib.24 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:49:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=S68d0YxxgLiSRUpBP1kSg1h9j0ZPlqSQrhPAyDPnR3k=; b=tWAn9X0b2wfjR3A3PnfKt8fNhHK590SC+nFlrVMdnQANj9tyuAxn+HsVqtLJuuSWff 3wVe/UbSZxY/gci7NjIIz2J8fRrwD8EWjjOH2PVrUEbEhpFBPLbr1nDGUV99bZO05NpP bWjnPr4Am8AV0BbEIDSgKjEIxtMzcsum6XnouXC2lM+0ntRWY5bnYZlZjMVv/RDFJMXO +wDPp8bB39SAQ72res3AbahOiftR0lnM7m0UCc7gstJYa2cFhsbXWDv5kqetWzyDCjsM e21eJrS+EJEsxVzfGMrV1h+iG7ZzTzXrTF7uubZGkqviq1JRdwBOj2/jt0sfQfDXauWU dr1w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.73.231 with SMTP id o7mr149634obv.56.1406760565546; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:49:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.93.69 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:49:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 18:49:25 -0400 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: bloat Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfe93fecb25c604ff70f78c Subject: [Bloat] is there no RED at level3? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:49:26 -0000 --047d7bfe93fecb25c604ff70f78c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have been following the level3 vs verizon debate with some interest, trying to sort out fact from fiction. It does appear that once they saturate a core interconnect they end up with nearly 100ms of latency in it. Is RED not available on 10GigE interconnects or any other mediation means to increase packet loss in exchange for getting better latency? http://blog.level3.com/global-connectivity/verizons-accidental-mea-culpa/#c= omment-41993 --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indece= nt.article --047d7bfe93fecb25c604ff70f78c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have been following the level3 vs verizon debate wi= th some interest, trying to sort out fact from fiction. It does appear that= once they saturate a core interconnect they end up with nearly 100ms of la= tency in it. Is RED not available on 10GigE interconnects or any other medi= ation means to increase packet loss in exchange for getting better latency?=

http://blog.level3.com/global-conne= ctivity/verizons-accidental-mea-culpa/#comment-41993



--
Dave T=C3=A4ht

NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_ce= nsorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article
--047d7bfe93fecb25c604ff70f78c--