Re: [Bloat] Bufferbloat in high resolution + non-stationarity

[Martin Geddes <mail@martingeddes.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2276 bytes --]

Hi Toke,

I'd really like to get it to be open source, and that's probably going to
take a collaborative industry funding effort to achieve as a reference
measurement implementation of a universal interoperable quality standard
(i.e. ∆Q-based metrics). There's a mathematical inevitability to the end
game of both metrics and scheduling, and we're very close to it.

In the meantime, I can give you a trial version to play with. How about you
give it a spin and share your feedback here of what you learned?

Martin

*About me <http://martingedd.es> Free newsletter
<http://eepurl.com/dSkfz>* Company
website <http://www.martingeddes.com/> Twitter
<https://twitter.com/martingeddes> Zoom <https://zoom.us/j/5043587162> My
new start-up <http://justright.network> Not LinkedIn
<https://medium.com/@martingeddes/linkedin-or-lockedin-why-i-deleted-my-account-and-maybe-you-should-too-8cad40a0ea68>
 Martin Geddes Consulting Ltd, Incorporated in Scotland, number SC275827
VAT Number: 859 5634 72 Registered office: 17-19 East London Street,
Edinburgh, EH7 4BN

On 28 November 2017 at 11:03, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:

> Martin Geddes <mail@martingeddes.com> writes:
>
> > The two critical references are this paper
> > <http://www.pnsol.com/public/TP-PNS-2003-09.pdf> and this PhD thesis
> > <https://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/pubs/2003/1892/>. The former describes
> > "cherish-urgency" multiplexing. The "cherish" is what is different to
> > today's scheduling. It is used to create a new class of algorithm
> > whose goal is global optimisation, not local optimisation (and global
> > pessimisation).
>
> Cool, thanks; I'll add that to my reading list (well, the paper
> certainly; not sure I'll get the time to go through the whole 200+ page
> thesis anytime soon :/)
>
> > The latter describes a paradigm change from "build it and then reason
> > about emergent performance" to "reason about engineered performance
> > and then build it". It works in practise
> > <http://www.martingeddes.com/how-wales-got-the-first-internet-fast-lane/
> >,
> > so whether it works in theory is left as an exercise to the reader.
>
> I don't suppose there's an open source implementation available to play
> with?
>
> -Toke
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3959 bytes --]