From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-gy0-f171.google.com (mail-gy0-f171.google.com [209.85.160.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D0632011CD for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ghbz17 with SMTP id z17so1485342ghb.16 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:23:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LvGm8uApvHPqu92gsj0+9D12vycPPjBw1E/CiyEnJxw=; b=UwsoxcNu2OCNmj+XWrUr73VaxF4O6vOGpKvJR5+eN+sNfagSfVRb+VG9ip01GWMQLr PLlmQNkr6v0s11Kcg6Eq7PZFOyDZt6FjYaXByVrsUC8unVPUZ9Fm8VoUCMaq4d1+74vN h6RfdKFhtoW7udC10h3GCjTb/6Tzlsn9enAF86pke+waXVIB1yafY3w+mgGqk4+DXbF2 4VcLRrraVOyRGWRUCDzYCqexkVddmOQRAsiL6NYOCo53ExeRaTy+dKu3dIRdKoY86/ZL XQcvEBnmeqcL0Aa8JFE7DKgv+lmvWqG02B2g1APwhHWF5zpeYwavILqMtMlWsoe0usCP 5sYA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.184.8 with SMTP id r8mr518056yhm.110.1334197381901; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:23:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.125.130 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:23:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:23:01 -0700 Message-ID: From: Christopher Sheats To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [Bloat] CeroWRT for x86? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 02:23:03 -0000 Hi, I'm looking to process 1Gbps, be it DDoS, Tor relay, or BitTorrent traffic on a WAN port. Even though the WNDR3800 has a gigabit WAN port, I'm not certain how successful it would be, especially with sustained traffic and keeping the components cool. OpenWRT has an x86 version, will CeroWRT? Thank you. -- Christopher Sheats yawnbox@gmail.com