From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com (mail-oi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F32921F200 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:20:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by oigz129 with SMTP id z129so85161250oig.1 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:20:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4FxiK1CLXlxMx08mbSup1aqVsUQlQMirrlGe9ESCTNA=; b=pTl9woZTfORKH93wQf+Pu3GEG57CPqrn6Rpv1poRQb75oRObbC4FxhaBMEugW7Ibc5 a+uvb0tWta/fE6UPkAJteYiSHGI5z44pjzW66tFvvEC7wYDNnLKpwsea9AUstJ1pbwv+ rjzYY5rXvjBmCjQK/6gbS2ykBOTYzJ07nQ5ftPO9ov6SnX9uWnDcrJXwBt//VkTELRrA TYSP+Dk60al8+YdbMWKVy0Rtbu9seDXuwmOdKZ8rDxD5c6KHBvZZrBQmOf3xljeH62nn zEy3y+BjBZk7Lfn/uThC3jL4oqWz84yT5J2I4J13scdKit7P/UGW3l1lG9w4ryMoGODr ybug== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.213.88 with SMTP id m85mr25550956oig.52.1427725251185; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:20:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.154.194 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:20:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <95B0F8DA-7650-4064-BEE6-F0CDF936D33A@gmail.com> References: <20150316203532.05BD21E2@taggart.lackof.org> <123130.1426635142@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <15A0911A-E3B7-440A-A26B-C5E1489EA98B@viagenie.ca> <1426773234.362612992@apps.rackspace.com> <1426796961.194223197@apps.rackspace.com> <5FD20B4A-A7E8-48C0-89F9-E2EB86DED8A6@gmail.com> <755FC1BE-141C-42FD-B3E3-564488982665@gmail.com> <95B0F8DA-7650-4064-BEE6-F0CDF936D33A@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:20:51 +0200 Message-ID: From: Pedro Tumusok To: Jonathan Morton Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113b02946f131205128230ca Cc: "dpreed@reed.com" , bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] Latency Measurements in Speed Test suites (was: DOCSIS 3+ recommendation?) X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:21:23 -0000 --001a113b02946f131205128230ca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Jonathan Morton wrote: > > > On 30 Mar, 2015, at 16:56, Pedro Tumusok > wrote: > > > > Also would you mind doing another test and share the link for result, s= o > he can check closer? > > I still have the result link for the earlier one: > > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/193440 > > Here=E2=80=99s another result without using the webcache, but keeping eve= rything > else the same: > > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/199524 > > For context, this is through the PowerBook which is running cake, 8Mbps > down and 1Mbps up. This is somewhat less than the capacity of the link, > but since it=E2=80=99s 3G it varies quite a lot anyway. > > > on the other things, yes I'd like to hear about buffer bloat ideas. > > The number-one desirable feature is to carry on measuring the latency > while the throughput test is ongoing. This is relevant to anyone who wan= ts > to make a VoIP call or play an online game while using the connection for > something else. If you have several people in one household, it=E2=80=99= s often > hard to coordinate their activity to avoid such multitasking. > > - Jonathan Morton > > I will forward it to him, hopefully he will signup here also, so the smart people can talk to each other and not having me mess it up :) --=20 Best regards / Mvh Jan Pedro Tumusok --001a113b02946f131205128230ca Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Jonathan Morton <= chromatix99@gmai= l.com> wrote:

> On 30 Mar, 2015, at 16:56, Pedro Tumusok <pedro.tumusok@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Also would you mind doing another test and share the link for result, = so he can check closer?

I still have the result link for the earlier one:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/193440
Here=E2=80=99s another result without using the webcache, but keeping every= thing else the same:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/199524
For context, this is through the PowerBook which is running cake, 8Mbps dow= n and 1Mbps up.=C2=A0 This is somewhat less than the capacity of the link, = but since it=E2=80=99s 3G it varies quite a lot anyway.

> on the other things, yes I'd like to hear about buffer bloat ideas= .

The number-one desirable feature is to carry on measuring the latenc= y while the throughput test is ongoing.=C2=A0 This is relevant to anyone wh= o wants to make a VoIP call or play an online game while using the connecti= on for something else.=C2=A0 If you have several people in one household, i= t=E2=80=99s often hard to coordinate their activity to avoid such multitask= ing.

=C2=A0- Jonathan Morton


I will forward it to him, hopefully he= will signup here also, so the smart people can talk to each other and not = having me mess it up :)


--
Best= regards / Mvh
Jan Pedro Tumusok

--001a113b02946f131205128230ca--